Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin --skill tech-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christiangalsterer/documentation-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin/tech-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin/tech-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin/tech-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin/tech-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin/tech-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.01301 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00520 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
tech-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tech Writer
Write technical documentation in a professional tone and grammar with a fixed document structure and Microsoft Writing Style Guide markdown conventions. Output is always a single markdown document.
Workflow
- Identify the audience and goal. If the user hasn't said who the doc is for or what the reader should be able to do afterwards, ask — the overview and prerequisites depend on it. Do not ask about anything else; use the defaults below.
- Gather the facts. Read the code, config, or notes the doc covers. Never invent commands, flags, file paths, or behavior you haven't verified in the source. Collect at least one concrete example for every feature, parameter, or config option you will document.
- Check for a domain skill. If the document's subject matches an available
domain skill (for example
kafka-integrationfor Kafka), use it to verify technical claims before drafting. Treat the user's notes as input to check, not as proof. If no domain skill is available, list the claims you could not verify and flag them in your reply. - Draft using the fixed structure below. Skip a section only when it is genuinely empty (e.g. no prerequisites) — never invent content to fill one. Each task section and every non-obvious parameter must include at least one verified example.
- Apply the conventions. Read
references/markdown-conventions.mdbefore writing and again as a checklist after drafting. It defines headings, lists, code blocks, links, tables, and tone rules. - Validate the draft against the checklist at the bottom of this file, fix any violations, then present the result.
Fixed document structure
Every document follows this order:
# <Title: concise, sentence case, states the task or topic>
<Overview: 1–3 short paragraphs. What is this, who is it for, what will
the reader achieve. No heading — this text directly follows the title.>
## Prerequisites
<Bullet list of required tools, access, knowledge, or prior steps. Omit
the whole section if nothing is required.>
## <Task sections — one H2 per major step or topic>
<Numbered steps for procedures; prose for concepts. Each step: one action,
imperative mood, starts with a verb.>
1. First action.
1. Second action. (Use `1.` for every item — let the renderer number them.)
### <Optional H3 subsections within a task>
## Troubleshooting
<Problem → cause → solution, one H3 per issue or a table. Omit if nothing
is known to go wrong.>
## Next steps
<Bullet list of links to related docs or follow-up tasks.>
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +6 lines e8cba42aa2cb
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 tokens per session 31d21c5be74e
- 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 29e5c3b81c28
tech-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository christiangalsterer/documentation-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,301 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
vibe-ship
Generates and audits production-ready deployment setups for any app. Detects the stack from the repo (Node/Next.js/Bun/Deno, Python/Django/FastAPI, Go, Rust, Java/Spring, .NET, Ruby/Rails, PHP/Laravel, Elixir/Phoenix, static sites, monorepos) and writes hardened Dockerfiles, .dockerignore, compose.yaml with…
test-driven-development
Strict red-green-refactor TDD workflow for implementing features, fixing bugs, or changing behavior in Rails applications. Enforces the discipline of writing a failing test before any production code. Use whenever you want to implement with TDD — whether a new feature, a bugfix, a refactor, or any behavior change.
git-commit
Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have.".
recursive-decomposition
Decompose dense codebase-wide, multi-document, PDF, and aggregation work even when the input fits the context window, following Recursive Language Models (Zhang, Kraska, Khattab, 2025). Use when the user asks to analyse all files, a whole repo, all docs, large PDFs, or to aggregate or multi-hop across scattered…
slice
Turn a feature into well-defined, independently shippable slices — whether it's an epic that needs breaking apart or a single story that needs sharpening into a job story.
design-tokens
This skill should be used when a user wants to scaffold or refactor a design token system — e.g. "set up design tokens", "create a design system foundation", "extract these hardcoded colors into tokens", "add a type scale", "theming setup", or "dark mode tokens". It produces a single source of truth for color, type…