Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chromium/chromium/experimental-code-coverage-config-validatornpx skills add chromium/chromium --skill experimental-code-coverage-config-validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chromium/chromiumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chromium/chromium/experimental-code-coverage-config-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chromium/chromium/experimental-code-coverage-config-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chromium/chromium/experimental-code-coverage-config-validator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00996 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
experimental-code-coverage-config-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Coverage Config Validator
Use this skill to verify if a Chromium builder is correctly configured in its
generated GN arguments (gn-args.json) to produce code coverage data.
Inputs
When invoking this skill, the caller MUST pass the following inputs in the prompt:
builders_of_concern: Target builder names to validate (e.g.,["linux-rel"]). To locate the Starlark.stardefinition file for each builder, reference: builder_star_map.json.language_context: The programming language context ("cpp","objc","rust","java","js", or"ts"). Consult [language_coverage_map.json][map_ref] for authoritative mappings.
When to Use This Skill
- Verifying if a builder has the correct GN arguments for code coverage.
- Debugging why code coverage artifacts are missing or not updated.
- Triaging a code coverage bug where builder configuration needs validation.
Validation Checks
Consult [language_coverage_map.json][map_ref] for the required settings mapped
to language_context. Verify that the builder's configuration (gclient_config
and generated gn-args.json) satisfies both:
- gclient Configuration: Inspect
builder_spec.gclient_configto confirm anyrequired_gclient_vars(e.g.,checkout_clang_coverage_toolsset viaapply_configs = ["use_clang_coverage"]). - GN Arguments (
gn_args): Inspect generatedgn-args.jsonto confirm allrequired_gn_argsare present.
Step-by-Step Execution
- Locate GN Args File: Search for
builder_nameinsideinfra/config/generated/builders/gn_args_locations.jsonto resolve its relative path (e.g.,"try/linux-rel/gn-args.json"). Read the JSON file atinfra/config/generated/builders/<relative_path>. - Inspect Configuration: Examine the
"gn_args"dictionary in the JSON. - Perform Checks: Check each required key-value pair as defined in the
Validation Checks section for the given
language_context. - Generate Report:
- Validation Success: If all checks pass, report builder is valid.
- Validation Failure: Detail missing or incorrect configurations.
Recommend updating the builder's Starlark file and regenerating configs via
lucicfg generate infra/config/main.star.
- Environment Reminder: If
language_contextis"cpp","objc", or"rust", append a reminder that local Clang code coverage generation requires"checkout_clang_coverage_tools": Truein the developer's~/.gclientfile undercustom_vars.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 108 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A d819cd0b2350
experimental-code-coverage-config-validator is a skill published in the GitHub repository chromium/chromium (24,700 stars, last pushed today), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 996 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…