Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chuyl/zeroclaw/github-prnpx skills add chuyl/zeroclaw --skill github-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chuyl/zeroclawWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01898 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00949 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00380 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
github-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 210 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: github-pr
Open or update a GitHub Pull Request for ZeroClaw. Handles creating new PRs with a fully filled-out template body, and updating existing PRs (title, body sections, labels, comments). Use this skill whenever the user wants to open a PR, create a pull request, update a PR, edit PR description, add labels to a PR, or sync a PR after new commits — even if they don't say "PR" explicitly (e.g., "submit this for review", "push and open for merge").
Instructions
This skill supports two modes: Open (create a new PR) and Update (edit an existing PR). Detect the mode from context — if there's already an open PR for the current branch and the user didn't say "open a new PR", default to update mode.
The PR template at .github/pull_request_template.md is the source of truth for the PR body structure. Read it every time — never assume or hardcode section names, fields, or their order. The template may change over time and the skill should always reflect its current state.
Shared: Read the PR Template
Before opening or updating a PR body, read .github/pull_request_template.md and parse it to understand:
- The
##section headers (these are the top-level sections of the PR body) - The bullet points, fields, and prompts within each section
- Which sections are marked
(required)vs optional/recommended - Any inline formatting conventions (backtick options, Yes/No fields, etc.)
This parsed structure drives how you fill, present, and edit the PR body.
Mode: Open a New PR
Step 1: Gather Context
Collect information to pre-fill the PR body. Run these in parallel:
# Branch and commit context
git branch --show-current
git log master..HEAD --oneline
git diff master...HEAD --stat
# Check if branch is pushed
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} 2>/dev/null
# Environment (for validation evidence)
rustc --version 2>/dev/null
Also review the changed files and commit messages to understand the nature of the change (bug fix, feature, refactor, docs, chore, etc.) and which subsystems are affected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 210 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0d5e3b8f3cda
github-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository chuyl/zeroclaw (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,898 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…