Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Clamepending/videomemory --skill videomemorygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Clamepending/videomemoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/clamepending/videomemory/videomemory)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clamepending/videomemory/videomemory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clamepending/videomemory/videomemory/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clamepending/videomemory/videomemory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clamepending/videomemory/videomemory.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00494 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
videomemory scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
VideoMemory
VideoMemory is a local camera monitor for Claude Code. Treat it as the user's local perception service: VideoMemory owns the video stream and long-running watch loop; Claude owns the user request and the follow-up response.
When the user says something like "download VideoMemory and watch my dog from my FaceTime camera":
- Call
mcp__videomemory__setup_localfirst.- Use the default
camera_id: "facetime"unless the user names another camera. - This starts/checks the local VideoMemory service, wires the webhook back to this Claude channel, and opens the browser FaceTime camera bridge.
- Use the default
- If setup returns
readiness.ready: false, report the exact readiness warnings and tell the user to grant browser camera permission in the opened camera tab. Do not claim the monitor is armed yet. - Use
mcp__videomemory__list_devicesonly if the user names a different camera or setup did not identify the expected device. - Create the monitor with
mcp__videomemory__create_monitor.- Put only the visual condition in
task_description, for examplethe user's pet dog is visible. - Use
io_id: "browser_facetime"for the browser FaceTime bridge unless the user chose a different device. - Use
monitor_type: "binary"for simple true/false criteria such as "dog is visible", "person is at the door", or "phone is held up". - Use
monitor_type: "general"only when the user wants richer notes or open-ended scene analysis.
- Put only the visual condition in
- Read the create-monitor response. If
readiness.readyis false, surface the blocker. If ready, tell the user the monitor is armed and VideoMemory will wake Claude when the condition is met. - Do not poll. VideoMemory will push a channel event when the monitor fires.
For incoming VideoMemory channel events, use the event note/task fields to
decide the response. If a test asks for a visible reply, call
mcp__videomemory__reply.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 32c73a24b6c2
videomemory is a skill published in the GitHub repository Clamepending/videomemory (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 494 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
videomemory compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| videomemoryClamepending/videomemory | Skill | 5 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| gke-compute-classesgoogle/skills | Skill | 22k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 83 | Claude Code, Codex |
| jetson-diagnosticNVIDIA/skills | Skill | 3.9k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 30 | Claude Code, Codex |
| holoscan-install-wheelNVIDIA/skills | Skill | 3.9k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 34 | Claude Code, Codex |
| offensive-z-waveSnailSploit/Claude-Red | Skill | 10k | 25d ago | MIT | A | 113 | Claude Code, Codex |
| doca-socket-relayNVIDIA/skills | Skill | 3.9k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 236 | Claude Code, Codex |
| hsb-flashNVIDIA/skills | Skill | 3.9k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | B | 94 | Claude Code |