Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add clearsmog/claude-skills --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clearsmog/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00618 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Adversarial Quality Audit Workflow
Iterative critic/fixer loop for any supported document format.
Format Detection
Determine file type from extension:
.tex→ Beamer LaTeX slides.qmd→ Quarto RevealJS slides (compare vs.texbenchmark if it exists).typ→ Typst document (audit against quality standards)
Workflow
Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds)
Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable, Universal)
| Gate | .tex | .qmd | .typ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overflow | No overfull hbox > 10pt | No content cut off | No content exceeds page |
| Content Quality | No undefined citations | Interactive >= static plots | All imports resolve |
| Typography | Consistent formatting | Notation fidelity | Font consistency |
Phase 0: Pre-flight
For .qmd files:
- Locate Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) files
- Check freshness (re-render if QMD newer than HTML)
- Verify TikZ SVGs if applicable
For .typ files:
- Locate the file, check it compiles
- Detect document type (slides, CV, guide, essay, report)
For .tex files:
- Locate the file, verify it compiles
- Check for auxiliary files (.aux, .bbl)
Phase 1: Initial Audit
Launch the quality-critic agent to audit the document. Report saved to quality_reports/[FILENAME]_qa_critic_round1.md.
Phase 2: Fix Cycle
If not APPROVED, launch quality-fixer agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-compile, and verify.
Phase 3: Re-Audit
Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed.
Iteration Limits
Max 5 fix rounds. After that, escalate to user with remaining issues.
Final Report
Save to quality_reports/[FILENAME]_qa_final.md with:
- Hard gate status
- Iteration summary (rounds, issues fixed per round)
- Remaining issues (if any)
- Final verdict
Quality Gates
See typst/references/quality-gates.md for score rubric, commit thresholds, and severity definitions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 76 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A deb7ec4c324a
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository clearsmog/claude-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 618 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-sync
Syncs latest release content to NotebookLM and HQ Knowledge Base after version tagging. Reads CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md, and hook README, updates notebook sources, and ingests release digest. Optionally generates podcast from updated knowledge base. Use after tagging a new version to propagate release knowledge.
replicate-runner
Use when run AI models on Replicate cloud API. Deploy image generation, video creation, audio processing, and custom models without managing infrastructure. Use when working with replicate runner.
flowise-builder
Use when flowise visual LLM workflow builder — drag-drop chatflows, API endpoints, document loaders, tools. Use when working with flowise builder.
aws-bedrock-data-automation-mcp
Analyze documents, images, videos, and audio.
pptx-translator
This skill should be used when the user needs to translate PowerPoint presentations (.pptx) between languages, preserving formatting and layout. Supports parallel slide-by-slide translation with per-slide validation and retry. Default languages are Portuguese and English but any language pair is supported.
board-material-distribution
A workflow for preparing and distributing board-meeting materials, such as agendas, reports, and decision documents, to directors.