Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add clearsmog/claude-skills --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clearsmog/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/clearsmog/claude-skills/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00692 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Universal Review
Auto-detect file format and launch the right review agents in parallel. Read-only — no fixes applied.
Format Detection
Determine file type from extension:
.tex→ Beamer LaTeX slides.qmd→ Quarto RevealJS slides.typ→ Typst document (slides, docs, guides, CVs).py→ Python script.md→ Markdown
For .typ files, also detect document type from content:
- Contains
#import "@preview/polylux"or#import "@preview/touying"→ Typst slides - Contains
#import "@local/qk"→ Uses qk component library - Contains
#set page(width: 16cm, height: 9cm)or similar → Presentation - Otherwise → Typst document (guide, essay, CV, etc.)
Routing Table
| Extension | Agents (parallel) | Condition |
|---|---|---|
.tex |
proofreader + document-auditor + pedagogy-reviewer | Always |
.tex |
+ diagram-reviewer | If TikZ found (\begin{tikzpicture}) |
.qmd |
proofreader + document-auditor | Always |
.qmd |
+ quality-critic | If .tex sibling exists |
.typ |
typst-reviewer + proofreader | Always |
.typ |
+ pedagogy-reviewer | If slide format detected |
.py |
python-pro (subagent) | Always |
.md |
proofreader | Always |
Steps
- Parse
$ARGUMENTS— resolve file path - Detect format from extension
- For
.typfiles, read file to detect document subtype - Launch agents in parallel per routing table
- Collect all reports from
quality_reports/ - Synthesize a consolidated summary table
Output
# Review Summary: [Filename]
| Dimension | Agent | Critical | Major | Minor | Verdict |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------|-------|---------|
| [varies] | [agent name] | N | N | N | [status] |
## Overall: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]
## Critical Issues (if any)
[List top issues requiring immediate attention]
## Reports Generated
- quality_reports/[file]_report.md
- quality_reports/[file]_typst_review.md
- ...
Quality Score Rubric
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 79 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 55796cbe036e
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository clearsmog/claude-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 692 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
replicate-runner
Use when run AI models on Replicate cloud API. Deploy image generation, video creation, audio processing, and custom models without managing infrastructure. Use when working with replicate runner.
review-agent
Use when reading code changes with adversarial intent to find bugs, security holes, logic errors, and performance traps.
karpathy-coding-principles
Use when andrej Karpathy's 4 coding principles — think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes, goal-driven execution. Use when coding, reviewing code quality, reducing overengineering,.
vicious-mockery
The bard's cantrip that deals psychic damage through insults. In practice this is adversarial review — the art of finding and articulating exactly what is wrong with something in a way that is impossible to ignore. Unlike polite feedback that gets filed and forgotten, vicious mockery lands. It is the red-team report…
perception
In D&D, Perception is the raw ability to notice things: the hidden door, the faint sound, the detail that does not belong. Unlike Investigation (which follows evidence methodically) or Insight (which reads subtext), Perception is about the initial act of noticing. The real-world version is detail-catching: spotting…
responding-to-feedback
Use when replying to feedback on your work (review comments, manuscript revisions, design critique, criticism).