Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Cleo-Labs-IA/skills_library --skill pet-product-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cleo-Labs-IA/skills_libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cleo-labs-ia/skills_library/pet-product-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cleo-labs-ia/skills_library/pet-product-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cleo-labs-ia/skills_library/pet-product-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cleo-labs-ia/skills_library/pet-product-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cleo-labs-ia/skills_library/pet-product-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.03644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00729 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
pet-product-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pet Product Compliance
Full regulatory workflow for pet food, treats, supplements, toys, accessories, and veterinary products. Feed regulation, nutritional adequacy, country variations.
Decision Flow
digraph {
rankdir=TB; node [shape=box style=rounded fontsize=10];
classify [label="1. Classify:\nfood / supplement / toy /\nveterinary medicine / cosmetic"];
species [label="2. Target species:\ndog / cat / small mammal / bird /\nreptile / fish"];
ingredients [label="3. Ingredient check\n(EU Catalogue, AAFCO definitions)"];
nutrition [label="4. Nutritional adequacy\n(FEDIAF / AAFCO profiles)"];
contaminants [label="5. Contaminants:\nmycotoxin, melamine, dioxin limits"];
label [label="6. Label per market\n(EU 767/2009 / AAFCO model)"];
reg [label="7. Registration:\nstate feed control, PARNUT"];
sell [label="8. Place on market"];
classify -> species -> ingredients -> nutrition -> contaminants -> label -> reg -> sell;
}
EU -- Feed Labeling Regulation 767/2009
| Requirement | Detail |
|---|---|
| Legal basis | Reg (EC) 767/2009 (marketing/use of feed) + Reg 1831/2003 (feed additives) + Reg 178/2002 (general food/feed law) + Reg 183/2005 (feed hygiene) |
| Categories | "Complete feed" (sole ration), "complementary feed" (additional), "mineral feed", "dietetic feed" (PARNUT -- particular nutritional purposes), "feed for pets" |
| Mandatory label items | Feed type, species, ingredients (descending order or % declaration), analytical constituents (protein, fat, fibre, ash; for cats/dogs also moisture if >14%), additives in declared categories (per 1831/2003), net quantity, best-before, batch number, manufacturer name+address, approval number where required |
| Feed additives | Pre-authorization required (Reg 1831/2003). EU Register of Feed Additives. 5 functional groups (technological, sensory, nutritional, zootechnical, coccidiostats) |
| Banned ingredients | Annex III: feces, urine, treated hides, certain ruminant materials (BSE controls), genetically modified material without authorization |
| PARNUT | Particular nutritional purposes list (Dir 2008/38/EC). 56 declared dietetic purposes. Each requires specific composition + label phrases |
| Health claims | Reg 767/2009 Article 13 limits claims. List of permitted claims under Reg 2017/1017. Veterinary medicinal claims = product becomes vet medicine, not feed |
| Establishment registration | Per Reg 183/2005 -- pet food manufacturers register or get approval from competent authority |
| Timeline | 4-8 weeks for label review + national notification |
| Cost | EUR 1,000-5,000 per product label compliance review |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 200 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A cd383a4f2641
pet-product-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository Cleo-Labs-IA/skills_library (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 3,644 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bfsg-dienstleistung-ecommerce
Barrierefreiheit von Dienstleistungen im elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr – Pflichten des Dienstleistungserbringers § 14 BFSG, Barrierefreiheitsinformationen nach Anlage 3 Nr. 1 mit Beschreibung, Erläuterung, Konformitätsdarlegung und Angabe der Marktüberwachungsbehörde, materielle Anforderungen der §§ 12, 13 und 19…
e-commerce-pflichten
Prüfung der Pflichten eines Online-Shops im elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr: allgemeine Pflichten (§ 312i BGB), besondere Verbraucherpflichten und Button-Lösung (§ 312j BGB) sowie Widerrufsrecht (§ 312g, § 355 BGB), inklusive der Folgen von Verstößen. Use when ein Online-Shop oder Bestellprozess auf gesetzliche…
einbeziehung-online-clickwrap-browsewrap
Für Einbeziehung Online Clickwrap Browsewrap: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.
kurzfristige-preiserhoehung-lieferfrist
Für Kurzfristige Preiserhöhung 309: prüft Frist, Form, Zuständigkeit und Eilbedarf; Ergebnis: Fristen- und Risikoampel. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: kurzfristige-preiserhoehung-lieferfrist.
plattform-online-gate-rollout-rangfolge
Für Plattform und Online Checkout: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: plattform-online-gate-rollout-rangfolge.
commerce-ad-claim-compliance-kr
A pre-publication check for Korean advertising and product-page wording. It reviews claims against South Korea's advertising, food-safety, and e-commerce laws.