Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cmaughan/Draxul. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cmaughan/Draxul/main/.agents/skills/draxul-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cmaughan/DraxulWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cmaughan/draxul/draxul-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cmaughan/draxul/draxul-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cmaughan/draxul/draxul-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cmaughan/draxul/draxul-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cmaughan/draxul/draxul-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00938 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
draxul-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 59 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A bdca10590055
draxul-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cmaughan/Draxul (67 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 938 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
assess-quality
Foundational quality framework: the five questions (readable, easy to start, expands without bloat, consistent, intentional) every other dev skill is judged against, plus the dual-audience and workshop principles. Use when onboarding to a project, defining a quality bar, setting an assessment checklist, or arbitrating…
merge-ready
Drive an existing pull request to a mergeable state: get CI green, resolve merge conflicts with the base branch, address and resolve review comments, trigger required bot reviews/approvals (e.g. commenting '@claude review'), link associated issues, and clean up the PR title and description. Ends with a readiness…
check-project
Validate project structure against scaffold conventions -- check for required files, CI consistency, documentation completeness, sub-package/workspace members, and optional directory usage, reporting PASS/WARN/FAIL with fix suggestions. Use to audit an existing project or verify a scaffold was applied correctly. Do…
review-diff
Standardized review of the CURRENT working-tree changes -- staged, unstaged, and untracked -- against an explicit five-dimension rubric (correctness, security, tests, scope-creep, conventions). Emits a prioritized findings list, each with file:line, severity, and a suggested fix. Read-only: it reviews and reports, it…
sync-ecosystem
Audit one repository against ecosystem conventions (naming, capabilities, terminology, doc coverage, version discipline, canonical skill coverage) and emit a read-only drift report. Use when onboarding a repo, auditing convention drift, or checking ecosystem consistency after a refactor. This skill only reports; it…
review-design
Pragmatic Programmer principles: DRY, orthogonality, ETC, reversibility, tracer bullets, design by contract, decoupling/Law of Demeter, pragmatic paranoia. The 'why' layer between assess-quality (framework) and write-code (operational). Use when reasoning about design tradeoffs, coupling, or whether a decision is…