Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cnfeat/top-pm-skills --skill designing-surveysgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cnfeat/top-pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/designing-surveys)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/designing-surveys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/designing-surveys/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/designing-surveys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/designing-surveys.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00812 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00406 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
designing-surveys scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Designing Surveys
Help the user design effective surveys using frameworks from 9 product leaders who have built rigorous research and feedback systems.
How to Help
When the user asks for help with surveys:
- Clarify the goal - Determine if they're measuring satisfaction, identifying problems, or prioritizing features
- Choose the right metric - Help them select between NPS, CSAT, PMF survey, or custom approaches
- Design clean questions - Ensure each question measures one thing precisely
- Target the right respondents - Help them reach users with fresh, relevant experience
Core Principles
NPS is scientifically flawed
Judd Antin: "NPS is the best example of the marketing industry marketing itself. The consensus in the survey science community is that NPS makes all the mistakes. Customer satisfaction, a simple CSAT metric, is better. It has better data properties, it is more precise, it is more correlated to business outcomes." Use CSAT with 5-7 item scales instead.
Force prioritization with constraints
Nicole Forsgren: "Let them pick three, just three. Of those three, how often does this affect you? Is this hourly? Is this daily? Is this weekly?" Limit respondents to their top barriers to keep data clean, then measure frequency to weight impact.
Survey your best customers at the right time
Gia Laudi: "Very importantly, they signed up for your product recently enough that they remember what life was like before. Generally, we say that's in the three to six-month range." Target customers who have been using the product 3-6 months so their memory of the 'before' state is fresh.
Onboarding surveys improve conversion
Laura Schaffer: "We just asked for forgiveness and put these questions into the signup flow. An improved conversion by like 5%, just improved signups." Adding 'good friction' in the form of targeted questions can increase conversion by reassuring users they're in the right place.
Avoid double-barreled questions
Nicole Forsgren: "You're asking four different questions there. If someone answers yes, was it the build? Was it the test? Was it slow or was it flaky?" Ensure each survey question only asks about one specific variable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 65 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 3269ff9d569f
designing-surveys is a skill published in the GitHub repository cnfeat/top-pm-skills (48 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 812 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…