evaluating-new-technology

evaluating-new-technology is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from cnfeat/top-pm-skills. It costs 36 tokens per session (915 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A framework for assessing new or emerging technology before choosing a tool or system. It starts with the problem, considers whether the technology is mature enough, compares building with buying, and plans for future change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for build-versus-buy decisions, AI vendor reviews, emerging-tool assessments, and technical architecture choices.
Why use it?
It helps prevent selecting technology before understanding the people, needs, risks, and long-term effects involved.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for build-versus-buy decisions, AI vendor reviews, emerging-tool assessments, and technical architecture choices.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cnfeat/top-pm-skills --skill evaluating-new-technology
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cnfeat/top-pm-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluating-new-technology

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluating-new-technology

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/evaluating-new-technology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 915 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00915
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00458
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00183
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00092

Measured 10d ago against content hash de7f6d80c920, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluating-new-technology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

参考skill/lenny-skills-main (2)/lenny-skills-main/skills/evaluating-new-technology/SKILL.md · 72 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Evaluating New Technology

Help the user evaluate emerging technologies using frameworks from 22 product leaders who have made critical technology decisions at companies from Google to Shopify.

How to Help

When the user asks for help evaluating technology:

  1. Start with the problem - Clarify what problem they're solving before discussing tools
  2. Assess maturity - Determine if the technology is stable enough for their use case
  3. Consider build and buy - Help them find the right mix rather than forcing a binary choice
  4. Plan for change - Design for modularity since the landscape will shift

Core Principles

Tools solve problems, not the reverse

Austin Hay: "I have this adage I always say, which is tools are just meant to solve problems. And the problem set for marketing technologists and business technologists is you focus on the tools." Always define the problem and the people involved before selecting a system or tool.

Build AND buy, not build vs buy

Austin Hay: "Build and buy as opposed to build versus buy. Build and buy means that both of you can win." Buy tools to handle 90% of standard functionality and build the 'cool' 10% that is unique to your business.

Evaluate mental bandwidth, not just dollars

Dhanji R. Prasanna: "The savings and costs that there might be in replacing a vendor tool by something you build in-house is probably not worth it in the mental bandwidth that you've lost." Focus technical bandwidth on core competencies, not recreating vendor tools.

Update your priors constantly

Aparna Chennapragada: "The models couldn't do some things one year ago. My impression of it from trying it a few months ago - that prior needs to be updated. The baby just grew up to be a 15-year-old in a month." Re-test assumptions about what technology can do every few months.

Bet on abstraction layers

Asha Sharma: "You really need to bet on a platform or some app server type layer that allows you to swap things in and out and not really be beholden to any one technology." Invest in modularity as the AI stack evolves.

Read the full file on GitHub · 72 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 72 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A de7f6d80c920

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluating-new-technology is a skill published in the GitHub repository cnfeat/top-pm-skills (48 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 915 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens