Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CobolJunkie/gitlab-mcp --skill gl-address-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CobolJunkie/gitlab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coboljunkie/gitlab-mcp/gl-address-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coboljunkie/gitlab-mcp/gl-address-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coboljunkie/gitlab-mcp/gl-address-comments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00430 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
gl-address-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Address GitLab Merge Request Comments
Use the bundled GitLab MCP tools for merge-request metadata, diffs, and
thread-aware discussions. Use local git for code changes and verification.
Workflow
- Resolve the project and merge-request IID from the request, GitLab URL, or the current checkout.
- Call
get_merge_request,list_merge_request_diffs, andlist_merge_request_discussions. - Focus on unresolved discussions and classify each as:
- actionable code or documentation work;
- a question needing a reply;
- already addressed or obsolete;
- unclear and requiring user direction.
- Summarize the actionable threads with their discussion IDs, locations, and requested outcomes.
- If the request includes implementation, edit only the agreed scope in the local checkout and run focused tests or checks.
- Reinspect the diff and explain how each selected thread was addressed.
- Reply with
reply_merge_request_discussionor resolve withresolve_merge_request_discussiononly when the user explicitly asked to post or resolve feedback.
Guardrails
- Do not infer that a request to review comments authorizes posting replies, resolving threads, approving, merging, committing, or pushing.
- Preserve unrelated local changes.
- Do not resolve a discussion until its requested change is implemented and verified, or the reviewer explicitly accepts a non-code resolution.
- If an inline position no longer maps cleanly to the current diff, report that rather than guessing.
- Never include secrets or credentials in discussion replies.
Output
Report fixed, pending, and non-actionable threads separately. Include focused test results and call out any thread still requiring a human decision.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 46 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 1c659d4fc22d
gl-address-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository CobolJunkie/gitlab-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…
frontend-code-review
Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., .tsx, .ts, .js). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.
init
Use when setting up PRFlow in a repo for the first time, or after a plugin update — scaffolds .prflow/config.json from the shipped template (when absent) or backfills newly-added keys into an existing one (preserving your values), and refreshes config.schema.json. Invoke explicitly with /prflow:init.
review
Use when the user wants code assessed rather than changed — "review PR 88", "is this branch ready to merge?", "look over my changes", "any problems with this diff?", "give me a code review", "what do you think of this PR?", "sanity-check this branch", "ship it?". Applies to a pull request or the current branch when…
review-and-fix
Use when the user wants problems in a pull request or the current branch both found AND corrected — "review my changes and fix what's wrong", "clean up whatever the review turns up", "address the review feedback on this branch", "tidy this PR up before merge", "find and fix the issues here". Requires explicit fix…