project-auditor

project-auditor is a skill for Claude Code from cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase. It costs 101 tokens per session (1,198 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A project-audit tool that checks whether a codebase is prepared for Grok Build and similar coding assistants. A codebase is a project's files, while CI is automated checking that runs when code changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a project directory, review agent instruction files and skills, check tests and CI, and receive a readiness score with prioritized fixes.
Why use it?
It reveals missing project instructions, tests, automation, ignore rules, or version-control hygiene that can make agent-assisted development less reliable.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to inspect a project directory, review agent instruction files and skills, check tests and CI, and receive a readiness score with prioritized fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase --skill project-auditor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for project-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for project-auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase/project-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,198 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.01198
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.00599
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00240
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00120

Measured 10d ago against content hash 548df9e0c18a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

project-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.grok/skills/project-auditor/SKILL.md · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Project Auditor Skill

You are an expert at evaluating how well a codebase is set up for productive use with Grok Build (and similar agentic coding tools).

Goals

  • Give an accurate 0-100 "Grok Readiness Score".
  • Identify concrete strengths and gaps.
  • Provide prioritized, actionable recommendations.
  • Support both human-readable and machine-readable output.

Steps

  1. Understand the target

    • Accept a directory path (default to current working directory or .).
    • Confirm the path exists using list_dir or run_terminal_command (ls or test -d).
  2. Load ignore rules

    • Read .grokignore (if present) and .gitignore (if present) from the target root.
    • Build an effective ignore matcher (respect both; .grokignore takes precedence for agent reads).
    • Never read files that would be ignored (node_modules, dist, .grok/sessions, large binaries, logs, etc.).
  3. Scan for Grok Build signals (use list_dir + read_file + grep selectively)

    • Look for project rule files in this priority: AGENTS.md, Agents.md, AGENT.md, CLAUDE.md etc. (see official project-rules docs).
    • Count and inspect files under .grok/skills/*/SKILL.md.
    • For each skill: read the frontmatter, verify name + description exist and description is specific.
    • Detect test frameworks:
      • package.json → look for vitest, jest, mocha, ava, tap, scripts.test
      • pyproject.toml / pytest.ini / setup.cfg for pytest
      • go.mod + _test.go files, etc.
    • Detect CI:
      • .github/workflows/ (any *.yml or *.yaml)
      • .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, circle.yml, buildkite.yml, etc.
    • Git hygiene:
      • Is it a git repo? (git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree)
      • Recent commits, clean/dirty status, branch name.
    • Other positive signals: README with "Grok", "agent", or "Plan Mode" mentions; CONTRIBUTING.md; .grok/ other dirs (hooks, agents).
  4. Score the project (0-100) Base scoring on these weighted signals (adjust reasonably for project type):

    • AGENTS.md (or equivalent) present and substantial (≥800 chars, has multiple clear sections): +25
    • At least 2-3 well-formed skills in .grok/skills/: +20
    • Real test setup with passing tests or clear test command: +20
    • CI configuration present: +10
    • Good ignore hygiene (.grokignore present or comprehensive .gitignore): +8
    • Recent, clean git history + sensible branch discipline: +7
    • Bonus for explicit verification language ("run tests before commit", "use check skill", Plan Mode guidance): +5-10
    • Penalties for anti-patterns (huge unignored node_modules in scans, no tests, AGENTS.md is just a one-liner, etc.)

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 86 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 548df9e0c18a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

project-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository cobusgreyling/grok-build-showcase (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,198 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.