Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus/requesting-code-reviewnpx skills add coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coctostan/pi-superpowers-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00721 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
73% identical to requesting-code-review — 46 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Related skills: Before requesting review, verify with
/skill:verification-before-completionthat tests pass.
Requesting Code Review
Dispatch a subagent with the code-reviewer prompt template to catch issues before they cascade.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
When to Request Review
Mandatory:
- After each task in subagent-driven development
- After completing major feature
- Before merge to main
Optional but valuable:
- When stuck (fresh perspective)
- Before refactoring (baseline check)
- After fixing complex bug
How to Request
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:
Fill the template at code-reviewer.md in this skill directory, then dispatch a subagent with it.
How to dispatch:
Use the subagent tool with the code-reviewer template filled in:
subagent({ agent: "code-reviewer", task: "... filled template ..." })
Placeholders:
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}- What you just built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}- What it should do{BASE_SHA}- Starting commit{HEAD_SHA}- Ending commit{DESCRIPTION}- Brief summary
3. Act on feedback:
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before proceeding
- Note Minor issues for later
- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)
Example
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch code-reviewer subagent]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 116 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A c3b2425e0d01
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository coctostan/pi-superpowers-plus (104 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 721 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 73% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 46 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pi-commandcode-release
Use when preparing, validating, publishing, or documenting a pi-commandcode-provider release/deployment, including version bumps, changelog entries, npm publish, GitHub releases, tags, and release follow-up comments.
refresh-model-catalog
Use when adding or removing Command Code models, refreshing the model catalog snapshot (image, reasoning, effort, output-limit metadata), updating display pricing, or refreshing test fixtures in pi-commandcode-provider.
surf
Control Chrome browser via CLI for testing, automation, and debugging. Use when the user needs browser automation, screenshots, form filling, page inspection, network/CPU emulation, DevTools streaming, or AI queries via ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/Grok/AI Studio.
prose-review
Review prose written for others -- user-facing docs, prompts for other LLMs, inline comments, docstrings, and other-facing messages -- for local jargon leakage, orphaned references, missing grounding, and audience or genre misfit.
text-search
Search indexed text corpora with qmd. For indexed content, prefer qmd over grep.
repoprompt-tool-guidance-refresh
Refresh RepoPrompt tool guidance when the CLI/MCP surface changes. Tracks RepoPrompt CE (rpce-cli, the maintained target) across versions, and can diff the frozen Classic CLI (rp-cli) against CE. Uses /.pi/agent/skills/repoprompt-tool-guidance-refresh/scripts/track-rp-version.sh to capture/diff --help and -l (tool…