Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Codagent-AI/agent-skills --skill review-specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Codagent-AI/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codagent-ai/agent-skills/review-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codagent-ai/agent-skills/review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codagent-ai/agent-skills/review-spec.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
review-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Spec
Review the supplied planning artifacts for internal coherence, structural testability, traceability, and cross-artifact consistency. Accept product and design choices as written; consequential gaps, alternatives, and weak decisions belong to an approach review.
Read all relevant markdown artifacts and infer their roles from path and content. Missing artifact types are not findings.
Check applicable concerns:
- contradictions, scope drift, dropped commitments, or terminology drift across artifacts;
- behavioral requirements without a concrete testable scenario, scenarios that do not express their requirement, or unresolved placeholders;
- tasks that are not self-contained, lack exact source citations, alter source acceptance criteria, over-prescribe implementation, retain placeholders, or separate ordinary infrastructure, tests, or docs from the behavior they support; and
- contradictions or unresolved references within an artifact.
Every finding must cite the exact path and section. Recommend the smallest consistency-preserving fix when more than one is possible.
Do not critique product intent or architecture, search for missing behavior or failure-mode decisions, review implementation code, invent missing artifacts, or rewrite the artifacts.
## Findings
### [high|medium|low] <title>
- Artifact: <path and section>
- Issue: <consistency, testability, traceability, or coherence defect>
- Fix: <smallest safe correction>
## Assessment
<Artifact readiness, or "No findings.">
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 41 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 29780839612a
review-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository Codagent-AI/agent-skills (30 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 348 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…