Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/coddy-project/coddy-agent/generate-rulesnpx skills add coddy-project/coddy-agent --skill generate-rulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coddy-project/coddy-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coddy-project/coddy-agent/generate-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coddy-project/coddy-agent/generate-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coddy-project/coddy-agent/generate-rules.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
generate-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate project rules
Use this skill when the user invokes /generate-rules. Behave like Cursor's built-in "Generate Cursor Rules": analyse the codebase first, derive rules from what you find, then write them without asking the user to describe the project.
Phase 1 — scan (do this before writing anything)
Read in order, skimming for patterns:
README.md,AGENTS.md,DESIGN.md— stated purpose, tech stack, conventions- Build / package manifest:
go.mod,package.json,Cargo.toml,pyproject.toml,Makefile— languages, dependencies, build commands, test commands - Top-level directory layout (
ls) — identify main packages / layers internal/orsrc/root — two or three representative source files per package (not all files)*_test.go/*.test.*/tests/— understand test strategy and naming- Existing rules under
.cursor/rules/,.coddy/rules/,.claude/rules/— read every file to avoid duplicates and understand what is already covered - CI config (
.github/workflows/,Dockerfile,.pre-commit-config.yaml) if present
Skip binary, generated, or vendored files.
Phase 2 — plan
After scanning, output a brief plan (not the rules yet): a table listing each proposed file, its globs/type, and one-line purpose. Ask the user to confirm, adjust scope, or skip topics before writing.
Example:
| File | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
architecture.mdc |
always, **/*.go |
layer dependencies and import direction |
code-style.mdc |
always, **/*.go |
formatting, lint, comment language |
testing.mdc |
always, **/*_test.go |
test commands, table-driven conventions |
api-layer.mdc |
manual | HTTP handler patterns and OpenAPI sync |
Update or skip existing files that already cover a topic well.
Phase 3 — write
Write each confirmed file. Default target directory:
.cursor/rules/if it already exists in the repo- Otherwise
.coddy/rules/ - Use
.claude/rules/only if the user explicitly asks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 84 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 8c217f5deb95
generate-rules is a skill published in the GitHub repository coddy-project/coddy-agent (128 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
copilot-pr-review-loop
Drive a GitHub pull request through repeated rounds of Copilot code review until convergence. Use when the user asks to "request Copilot review", "run a Copilot review loop", iterate on Copilot feedback, or wants automated triage-and-respond on Copilot PR comments. Covers re-request mechanics, open-thread filtering…
upstream-sync
Periodically sync new commits from microsoft/terminal into this manually-forked intelligent-terminal repo by cherry-picking commit-by-commit onto a dated sync branch, auto-skipping revert pairs and empty commits, auto-resolving known take-upstream files, and stopping cleanly on genuine conflicts. The agent (you…
release-notes
Generate user-facing release notes for Intelligent Terminal. Use when asked to write release notes, changelog, what-is-new summary, or prepare a release. Compares git commits between releases, looks up PR-linked issues and community contributors, then outputs formatted notes with "Verbed + Impact + Scenario" style…
add-acp-agent-support
Add first-class support for an ACP-compatible agent CLI to Intelligent Terminal. Use when integrating a new built-in AI agent, ACP server command, authentication flow, model selection, interactive delegation, session hooks, onboarding, Settings, branding, GPO policy, documentation, tests, build, deployment, or live…
pr-integration-test
Design, implement, and validate Intelligent Terminal integration tests for a target pull request or regression. Use when asked to add PR integration tests, convert a bug fix into E2E coverage, prove existing behavior still works, map tests to the release checklist, or verify E2E reports mark checklist cases complete.
store-listing-localizer
Automate Microsoft Store (Partner Center) listing localization for Intelligent Terminal (Store ID 9NMQC2SSJX24). Use when asked to export/import Store listings, localize release notes / descriptions / captions / features into 80+ languages, update listingData CSV, or push Store listing translations without manually…