coding-agent-extension-worker

A coding task worker for implementing one specified feature in the pi-mono todotools extension.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for refactoring, runtime continuation work, configuration resolution, prompt building, tests, saved-output comparisons, change log entries, and test-harness helpers. It does not perform manual tmux testing.
Why use it?
It keeps a coding change focused on one feature and its required checks instead of mixing unrelated work into the same task.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/code-yeongyu/senpi/coding-agent-extension-worker
Any agent
npx skills add code-yeongyu/senpi --skill coding-agent-extension-worker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/code-yeongyu/senpi

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 61 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,508 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00061 $0.02508
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.01254
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00502
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00251

Measured 2d ago against content hash b98592a87474, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coding-agent-extension-worker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.factory/skills/coding-agent-extension-worker/SKILL.md · 138 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coding Agent Extension Worker

You are implementing exactly ONE feature from features.json in the senpi-mono coding-agent package. Your feature has been pre-assigned — read it from features.json, identify it by its id, and focus exclusively on its description, preconditions, expectedBehavior, verificationSteps, and the assertions listed in fulfills.

Context you MUST read before starting

  1. Feature spec: features.json — your assigned feature only.
  2. Mission document: mission.md in the mission directory — for overall context.
  3. Validation contract: validation-contract.md — each ID in your feature's fulfills describes the exact pass/fail condition you must satisfy. Read ALL your fulfills entries before you start.
  4. Architecture: .factory/library/architecture.md — the target system shape. Your work MUST conform to this.
  5. Environment notes: .factory/library/environment.md — tooling quirks, forbidden patterns.
  6. User testing surface: .factory/library/user-testing.md — test infrastructure conventions.
  7. Mission agents guidance: AGENTS.md in the mission directory — boundaries, conventions, git safety rules.
  8. Project agents guidance: the root AGENTS.md at the repo root (senpi-mono coding guidelines) — fork strategy, commit conventions, anti-patterns.

Hard rules — never violate

  • Fork strategy: Every change is a builtin-extension change. You may not modify packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/tui, packages/mom, packages/pods, packages/coding-agent/src/core/settings-manager.ts, packages/coding-agent/src/core/extensions/types.ts, runner.ts, loader.ts, wrapper.ts, or any other builtin extension besides todotools/ and builtin/index.ts.
  • No type suppressions: any, as any, @ts-ignore, @ts-expect-error are forbidden across all files in builtin/todotools/. Use explicit type guards instead.
  • No inline imports: top-level ES imports only. Never await import() or import("pkg").Type.
  • No real LLM calls in tests: always use the faux provider via createHarness.
  • Git safety: only git add <specific-path>. Never -A, never ., never --no-verify, never reset --hard, never checkout ., never clean -fd, never stash.
  • Only commit files you touched in this session. Inspect git status before staging.
  • No emojis in code, commits, test names, or PR comments.
  • Biome enforced: 3-space / tab indent matching the existing file style, 120-char line width.
  • tsc enforced: all code compiles cleanly with no diagnostics.

Read the full file on GitHub · 138 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 138 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A b98592a87474

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coding-agent-extension-worker is a skill published in the GitHub repository code-yeongyu/senpi (411 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,508 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

make-skill

Use this skill when sedimenting a session into a reusable workspace skill. Triggers when the user wants to turn the current conversation, workflow, or troubleshooting path into a SKILL.md. Phrases like 'turn this into a skill', 'remember how I did X', 'save this workflow', 'make a skill from this', and any /make-skill…

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 85 tokens

make-skill

用于把当前会话沉淀为可复用的 workspace skill。当用户希望把当前对话、工作流或排错路径写成 SKILL.md 时触发。触发表达包括「把这个变成 skill」「记住我是怎么做 X 的」「保存这个工作流」「make a skill from this」以及任何 /make-skill 调用。.

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 84 tokens

terraform-skill

Use when working with Terraform or OpenTofu - creating modules, writing tests (native test framework, Terratest), setting up CI/CD pipelines, reviewing configurations, choosing between testing approaches, debugging state issues, implementing security scanning (trivy, checkov), or making infrastructure-as-code…

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 62 tokens

docx

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of "Word doc", "word document", ".docx", or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when…

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 168 tokens

docx

当用户需要创建、读取、编辑或处理 Word 文档(.docx)时,使用此技能。触发场景包括提到“Word 文档”、“.docx”,或要求生成带目录、标题、页码、信头等格式的专业文档;也包括提取或重组 .docx 内容、插入或替换图片、在 Word 文件中查找替换、处理修订或批注,以及将内容整理为正式 Word 文档。如果用户要求生成“报告”“备忘录”“信函”“模板”等 Word / .docx 交付物,也应使用此技能。不要用于 PDF、电子表格、Google Docs,或与文档生成无关的一般编程任务。.

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 161 tokens

multi_agent_collaboration

Use this skill when another agent's expertise or context is needed, or when the user explicitly asks to involve another agent. First list agents, then use qwenpaw agents chat for two-way communication with replies.

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw · 47 tokens