Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add codebygarv/Ai-skills --skill ui-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codebygarv/Ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codebygarv/ai-skills/ui-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codebygarv/ai-skills/ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codebygarv/ai-skills/ui-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codebygarv/ai-skills/ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codebygarv/ai-skills/ui-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
ui-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Audit a UI implementation (code, screenshot, or both) for visual consistency and design quality — spacing, alignment, hierarchy, and adherence to the project's existing design patterns.
When to Use
- After implementing or changing a UI, before it ships.
- Reviewing a screen/component that feels "off" but it's unclear why.
- Comparing a new UI against the rest of the app for consistency.
For narrower, deeper dives, pair with Responsive Checker, Accessibility Auditor, Design System Guardian, or UI Text Formatter — this skill covers general visual quality across all of those areas at a lighter level.
What to Analyze
- Spacing & alignment — inconsistent gaps, misaligned elements, uneven padding between visually-similar components.
- Visual hierarchy — is the most important element actually the most prominent? Does heading/body/caption sizing create clear scan order?
- Consistency with the rest of the app — does this screen reuse existing components/patterns, or does it quietly reinvent a button/card/input style that already exists elsewhere?
- Color & contrast usage — colors used with clear purpose (not decoratively inconsistent), sufficient contrast for readability.
- State coverage — does the UI account for empty, loading, error, and populated states, not just the "happy path" screenshot?
- Density & whitespace — is the layout too cramped or too sparse relative to the content's importance and the rest of the app's density?
Output Format
- Findings grouped by area (Spacing, Hierarchy, Consistency, Color/Contrast, State Coverage).
- Each finding: what's inconsistent/wrong, where (component/screen), and a concrete fix (exact spacing value, which existing component to reuse, etc.).
- Flag anything that's a design-system violation specifically, and note that Design System Guardian can do a deeper token-level pass if useful.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A af3021d1b2ae
ui-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository codebygarv/Ai-skills (27 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
super-design
Use when the user asks you to build, style, theme, refine, audit, or recreate UI — or uploads a screenshot to rebuild. Reads DESIGN.md as a closed token layer, detects the project's framework (Tailwind v4/v3, ShadCN, MUI, Radix, Geist), and enforces production design rules (tokens only, full state matrix, WCAG 2.2 AA…
ds-frontend
Frontend design quality — design-system audit, token enforcement, component states, accessibility, responsive layout, theming. Use when building or reviewing UI for design consistency, a11y, or responsiveness.
premium-hero-builder
Build premium, dark-themed hero sections and landing pages with cinematic video backgrounds, liquid glass morphism, editorial typography, and pixel-perfect specifications. Based on the Viktor Oddy methodology of detailed design prompts that produce agency-quality results from AI code generation. Use when building hero…
web-ui-ux
Web UI/UX specialist guidance for designing, reviewing, and polishing web product UI (layout, usability, microcopy, accessibility, responsive behavior, forms, navigation). Use when asked to improve UI/UX, audit a page, design a screen, create a component spec, or generate HTML head/manifest/icon guidance for a web…
web-typography
Select, pair, and implement typefaces for web projects. Use when the user mentions "font pairing", "which typeface", "line height", "responsive typography", "web font loading", "type hierarchy", "variable fonts", "FOUT/FOIT", "typographic scale", or "the text is hard to read". Also trigger when choosing between system…
accessibility
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is design), NOT test-runner setup (that is testing-web), NOT LCP/page-speed (that is…