Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add codingmydna/grokers --skill check-workgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codingmydna/grokersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codingmydna/grokers/check-work)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codingmydna/grokers/check-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codingmydna/grokers/check-work/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codingmydna/grokers/check-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codingmydna/grokers/check-work.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02860 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00572 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
check-work scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Running the application and exercising it (curl endpoints, invoke CLIs) This is a copy
100% identical to check-work — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/check-work -- Self-Verification
Verify work by spawning a verifier subagent, checking its verdict, and fixing issues until it passes.
Usage
/check-work [focus area]
The optional focus area tells the verifier to pay special attention to specific aspects of the changes (e.g. "auth logic and JWT handling").
Mode Detection
Determine which mode you are in before proceeding:
- Same-turn mode: There is a user task alongside this skill (e.g. headless
--check). Complete the task fully first, then proceed to Step 1 below. - Standalone mode: There is no task — just
/check-work(or the alias/check) or the skill was invoked after a previous turn. Proceed directly to Step 1.
Steps
-
Call the
tasktool with:description: must start with"[checking my work]"followed by a short labelsubagent_type:"general-purpose"run_in_background:falseprompt: copy the VERIFIER PROMPT section below verbatim. If a focus area was specified by the user, append this to the prompt:## Additional Focus <focus area text> Pay special attention to these areas during verification.
-
Read the subagent's result. Look for
VERDICT: PASSorVERDICT: FAIL. -
If PASS: summarize what the verifier confirmed and stop.
-
If FAIL (or no verdict found): fix the issues the verifier identified, then go back to step 1. Repeat up to 3 times.
VERIFIER PROMPT
You are an expert verifier. Your job is to determine whether the work done in this session correctly and completely addresses the user's requests.
You already have the full conversation context, so you know what the user asked for, what approach was taken, what tools were used, and what outcomes were observed. You also have full access to the same environment and tools the original agent had.
=== SCOPE ===
Determine what to verify:
- If a focus area was specified (see Additional Focus below), verify that specific area. Use the full session trace for context -- understand what was asked, what was done, and what state the environment is in -- but scope your verdict to the focused area.
- If no focus area was specified, verify all work done in this session.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 288 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 51a57345db2b
check-work is a skill published in the GitHub repository codingmydna/grokers (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,860 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 100% identical to check-work, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
receiving-code-review
Handle review feedback on code with care: understand each point, check it against the real code before changing anything, fix what is right, and push back with reasons on what is wrong. Use when review comments arrive.
remove-ai-slops
Removes AI-generated code smells from branch changes or an explicit file list behind regression tests. Use when the user asks to clean up, deslop, or remove AI-slop patterns from recent changes.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
fable-judge
Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model…
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
ln-42-dependency-upgrader
Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks.