test-driven-development

test-driven-development is a skill for Claude Code from Codoop/codoop-flow. It costs 50 tokens per session (3,531 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of test-driven-development, MIT.

A development method that writes a failing automated test before changing code, then uses the test to confirm the change works.

In plain words
What is it for?
Adding logic, fixing bugs, changing behavior, handling edge cases, and proving that code works with tests.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of fixing the wrong problem or breaking existing behavior without noticing.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the codoop-flow plugin — 12 skills, 14 agents shipped together

Good fit Adding logic, fixing bugs, changing behavior, handling edge cases, and proving that code works with tests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Codoop/codoop-flow --skill test-driven-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Codoop/codoop-flow

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install codoop-flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills, 14 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-driven-development

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-driven-development

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codoop/codoop-flow/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,531 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.03531
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.01412
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00706
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00353

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 6489b31c6bee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to test-driven-development — 32 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md · 395 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 395 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test-Driven Development

Conversation Profile

When the session's explicit config, or the Git root's .codoop-flow/codoop_flow.toml (legacy fallback: root codoop_flow.toml), is available, read user_role; a missing value means general. It applies only to this conversation: use normal professional terms inside the user's field, and explain cross-field topics in plain language. The user may override it for the current conversation by asking for simpler or more professional language. Never apply the profile to code, PRD, Spec, Plan, Todo, reports, agent prompts, or other generated files; those stay precise and professional.

Overview

Write a failing test before writing the code that makes it pass. For bug fixes, reproduce the bug with a test before attempting a fix. Tests are proof — "seems right" is not done. A codebase with good tests is an AI agent's superpower; a codebase without tests is a liability.

When to Use

  • Implementing any new logic or behavior
  • Fixing any bug (the Prove-It Pattern)
  • Modifying existing functionality
  • Adding edge case handling
  • Any change that could break existing behavior

When NOT to use: Pure configuration changes, documentation updates, or static content changes that have no behavioral impact.

Related: For browser-based changes, combine TDD with runtime verification using Chrome DevTools MCP — see the Browser Testing section below.

The TDD Cycle

    RED                GREEN              REFACTOR
 Write a test    Write minimal code    Clean up the
 that fails  ──→  to make it pass  ──→  implementation  ──→  (repeat)
      │                  │                    │
      ▼                  ▼                    ▼
   Test FAILS        Test PASSES         Tests still PASS

Step 1: RED — Write a Failing Test

Write the test first. It must fail. A test that passes immediately proves nothing.

// RED: This test fails because createTask doesn't exist yet
describe('TaskService', () => {
  it('creates a task with title and default status', async () => {
    const task = await taskService.createTask({ title: 'Buy groceries' });

    expect(task.id).toBeDefined();
    expect(task.title).toBe('Buy groceries');
    expect(task.status).toBe('pending');
    expect(task.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
  });
});

Read the full file on GitHub · 395 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 6489b31c6bee
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 394 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 3317e80ddb45

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository Codoop/codoop-flow (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 3,531 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 32 lines, and is treated as a copy.