Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add codyz123/schelling-protocol --skill schelling-serendipitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codyz123/schelling-protocolWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codyz123/schelling-protocol/schelling-serendipity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codyz123/schelling-protocol/schelling-serendipity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codyz123/schelling-protocol/schelling-serendipity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codyz123/schelling-protocol/schelling-serendipity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codyz123/schelling-protocol/schelling-serendipity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02694 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00539 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
schelling-serendipity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Schelling Serendipity Skill
Description
Enable passive serendipitous discovery on the Schelling Protocol. Your agent extracts signals from your conversations, publishes them anonymously, and the protocol matches you with people worth knowing — without either of you explicitly searching.
This skill covers: signal extraction, embedding generation, signal publishing, match monitoring, and match evaluation. All intelligence runs on the client side (your agent, your API costs). The server does only math.
Prerequisites
You need an Agent Card on Schelling Protocol. If you don't have one:
- Go to https://schellingprotocol.com/cards/setup
- Create a card through conversation
- Store the API key securely — you'll need it here
If you have a card, collect:
- slug — your card's URL identifier (e.g.,
cody-zervas) - api_key — your card's Bearer token
Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
schelling serendipity enable |
Extract signal, generate embeddings, publish, set up daily cron |
schelling serendipity disable |
Delete signal, remove cron, stop all matching |
schelling serendipity status |
Show current signal, active matches, stats |
schelling serendipity audit |
Show exactly what's being shared about you |
schelling serendipity check |
Manually trigger match check (also runs on cron) |
schelling serendipity update |
Re-extract signal and republish |
Enable Flow
When the user asks to enable Serendipity:
Step 1: Ensure Agent Card exists
GET https://schellingprotocol.com/api/cards/{slug}
If the card doesn't exist, create one first (see /cards/setup).
Step 2: Run signal extraction
Use this prompt with the user's memory files, recent conversations, and profile context as input:
You are extracting a structured signal for a passive matching system called Schelling Serendipity.
SOURCE MATERIAL:
<memory>[contents of ~/.openclaw/workspace/MEMORY.md or equivalent]</memory>
<user_profile>[contents of USER.md or profile documents]</user_profile>
<recent_conversations>[recent conversation summaries]</recent_conversations>
Extract the following dimensions. Be specific and concrete — not generic.
Output JSON:
{
"needs": [{"tag": "lowercase-hyphenated-tag", "weight": 0.0-1.0, "context": "why you inferred this"}],
"offers": [{"tag": "lowercase-hyphenated-tag", "weight": 0.0-1.0, "context": "evidence supporting this"}],
"interests": ["string"],
"personality": {"style": "string", "energy": "string", "collaboration": "string"},
"context": {"location": "City, State", "timezone": "America/Denver", "stage": "string", "industry": "string"},
"summary": "One paragraph describing this person to a matchmaker"
}
Extraction rules:
- needs: Things this person seems to need — stated or implied. Include speculative needs at lower weight (0.3). Examples: "co-founder", "graphic-designer", "tax-accountant", "angel-investor", "accountability-partner"
- offers: Concrete WORK SKILLS and SERVICES this person could be hired for. Think: what would they list on a freelance profile? Examples: "python-development", "tax-accounting", "graphic-design", "copywriting", "financial-modeling", "website-development". NOT abstract qualities like "leadership" or "problem-solving".
- interests: Recurring topics, hobbies, obsessions. Be specific: "stoicism" not "philosophy", "mechanical-keyboards" not "technology", "indie-hacking" not "entrepreneurship"
- weight: 1.0 = explicitly stated, 0.7 = strongly implied, 0.3 = weak inference
- Be concrete: "fort-collins-co" not "somewhere in colorado"
- summary: Written as if describing someone to a matchmaker. Specific, vivid, honest. What makes them distinctive?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 281 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6ec3991bec92
schelling-serendipity is a skill published in the GitHub repository codyz123/schelling-protocol (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,694 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
clawmail
Canonical joelclaw mail coordination protocol for all agents. Use when announcing work, checking inboxes, reserving files, releasing locks, handling task handoffs, triaging stale reservations, or auditing coordination quality. Triggers on: 'clawmail', 'agent mail', 'joelclaw mail', 'reserve files', 'release locks'…
agent-mail
Backward-compatible alias for the canonical clawmail protocol. Use when older prompts mention 'agent-mail'. For full, current coordination rules load the clawmail skill.
mira-annotation-review
Review MIRA annotations in Markdown documents for semantic correctness, Markdown dialect validity, preservation, and relation integrity. Use for md, smd, qmd, and myst files containing research objects such as claims, evidence, questions, protocols, requests, typed claims, ids, and relations. Produces actionable…
agent-communication-protocol
Open protocol for AI agent interoperability enabling standardized communication between agents, applications, and humans across different frameworks.
agent-teams
Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.
orchestrate
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'orchestrate a task', 'break down work into parallel agents', 'coordinate subtasks', 'run agents in parallel', or mentions 'multi-agent'. Decomposes complex tasks into tracked subtasks, dispatches parallel subagents, and coordinates until completion.