Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add coeusyk/inference-x --skill cut-releasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coeusyk/inference-xWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coeusyk/inference-x/cut-release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coeusyk/inference-x/cut-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coeusyk/inference-x/cut-release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coeusyk/inference-x/cut-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coeusyk/inference-x/cut-release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01009 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
cut-release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cut a release
Use when asked to release, version-bump, or judge whether accumulated
develop work is "worth" a release.
1. Decide the version — semver.org rules
Given pyproject.toml's current version and the set of OpenSpec changes
merged to develop since the last release tag:
- MAJOR (
X.0.0) — any backward-incompatible change to a public contract: a route removed/renamed, a response schema field removed or repurposed, a behavior change existing callers relied on. - MINOR (
X.Y.0) — new backward-compatible functionality: a new route, a new optional field, a new capability that doesn't touch existing contracts. - PATCH (
X.Y.Z) — backward-compatible bug fixes only, no new surface.
Bump once for the whole batch, not once per change — take the highest tier any single change in the batch requires. A batch containing one MINOR change and three PATCH changes is still MINOR.
This repo treats 0.x releases as real, numbered, user-facing releases
(see existing tags) — don't withhold a release just because major version is
still 0.
2. Confirm release-worthiness
Not every merge needs a release. Cut one when develop has diverged from
the last release tag with at least one user-visible change (new endpoint,
behavior fix, dependency-facing change). Pure internal refactors with zero
external surface change (like an engine-driver swap with no API change) are
still worth bundling into the next release rather than triggering one alone
— check git log <last-tag>..develop --oneline for what's accumulated.
3. This repo's release pattern (mirror it, don't reinvent)
Verified from git history (git show --stat on prior release-prep commits,
e.g. 5b81605, 51c764f):
- Feature work already landed on
developvia normalfeat/→developPRs (each with its ownfeat(...)commit + separatechore(openspec): archive <id>commit). - Branch
chore/release-vX.Y.Zfromdevelop. - Bump only
pyproject.toml'sversionfield and regenerateuv.lock(uv lock) — nothing else.CHANGELOG.mdis NOT touched by this commit; there is no repo precedent for closing out## [Unreleased]into a versioned section, and none should be invented without asking. - Commit as
chore(release): prepare Phase A vX.Y.Z(adjust the phase name if the repo has moved past Phase A). - PR
chore/release-vX.Y.Z→develop, wait for the requiredchecksCI job, merge. - PR
develop→main(title:Release vX.Y.Z: <short theme>), wait forchecks, merge.mainrequires code-owner review per the "Protect Main" ruleset — if merge is blocked on review, stop and ask rather than overriding it. - On
main, tag:git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m vX.Y.Z && git push origin vX.Y.Z. gh release create vX.Y.Z --title "vX.Y.Z — <theme>" --notes-file ...with a hand-authored narrative body (NOT a copy ofCHANGELOG.md's terse bullets) structured as:- Title:
InferenceX vX.Y.Z — <thematic summary> ### What changed— one subsection per OpenSpec change, each a prose paragraph naming the change id and explaining what changed and why, in the style of prior releases (gh release view v0.3.0 --json bodyfor reference).- Optional
### Alsocatch-all for minor/doc-only additions. **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/compare/vPREV...vNEW
- Title:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 9754c52113a2
cut-release is a skill published in the GitHub repository coeusyk/inference-x (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,009 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pypi-release
This skill should be used when releasing tunacode-cli to PyPI. It keeps the existing local release checks, then hands the actual PyPI upload to a GitHub Actions workflow that uses the repository's PYPIAPITOKEN secret.
prep-repo
Prepare an existing project for GitHub or public release with scope-appropriate checks for sensitive data, documentation, installation, tests and release artifacts. Separate release blockers from polish, preserve existing authorization, and verify the published result only when publishing is requested. Not for…
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
mem0-test-integration
Verify a Mem0 integration produced by /mem0-integrate. Runs in the same workspace on the same branch (loose coupling) — installs dependencies, runs the repo's native test suite, then exercises a real end-to-end smoke flow against the user's API key. Produces a scorecard. TRIGGER when: user has just run /mem0-integrate…
groq-inference
Ultra-fast LLM inference on custom LPU hardware. OpenAI-compatible API at api.groq.com. Lowest latency in the industry (500-1000+ tok/s). Supports chat completions, vision, audio (Whisper STT + TTS), tool calling, JSON mode, and streaming. Free tier available. Inference only — no training.
xberg-release
Xberg release on top of the shared release-workflow: task version:sync to bindings and chart, CI/Publish/Benchmarks readiness. Use before a release.