Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Cognigy/cognigy-plugin. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cognigy/cognigy-plugin/main/.claude/skills/add-eval/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cognigy/cognigy-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/add-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/add-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/add-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/add-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/add-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01552 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00621 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
add-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evals run the plugin in a sandboxed claude -p child against a mocked platform server and grade the transcript. Reference: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/plugin-evals.md (claude plugin eval --help matches it).
Layout
plugin/evals/
<group>/<case>/prompt.md frontmatter (tags, max_turns, allowed_tools) + the prompt, sent verbatim
<group>/<case>/graders/<name>.md one grader per file
<group>/<case>/mocks/platform/<tool>.md per-case override of one tool
mocks/platform/_server.md judge model plays a fixed demo tenant for every tool
mocks/platform/_tools.json real descriptions/schemas — generated, never hand-edit
baseline.json committed per-grader pass rates, see "Run and compare"
results/ gitignored run output
Groups today: skill-triggers/, tool-choice/. The demo tenant (Demo Project, Billing Bot, Phone Support, GPT-4o) is defined in _server.md; write prompts against it.
Write a case
- Copy the closest existing case. The prompt is phrased like a user, never names the skill or tool, and contains everything needed — the run starts in an empty directory and cannot ask follow-ups. Add "I'm not around to answer questions, so pick sensible defaults and go ahead." unless asking IS the behaviour under test (
tool-choice/backup-gate). - Give it one grader on the steps (
tool_used/tool_order/ traceregex) and, where there is a result to judge, one on the outcome (regexonlast_message, or a shortllmrubric written as PASS/FAIL conditions). - Set
max_turnsgenerously (25–30 for build flows); hitting it is a run error. Judge-played mocks get 4 ×max_turnscalls. - Smoke it:
npm run evals -- --case <name> --runs 1 --keep-temp, then read<kept>/out/trace.jsonlandout/mock-calls.jsonlto confirm the run took the path you meant — a pass can be for the wrong reason. - Run it at 3 runs and re-baseline (below).
MCP tools are named mcp__plugin_cognigy_platform__<tool>; plugin skills are invoked as cognigy:<skill>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago First seen · 68 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 19bf1174f97f
add-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository Cognigy/cognigy-plugin (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,552 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-20.
add-eval compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| add-evalCognigy/cognigy-plugin | Skill | 18 | yesterday | MIT | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |