Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc --skill rmbc-copy-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/rmbc-copy-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/rmbc-copy-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/rmbc-copy-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/rmbc-copy-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc/rmbc-copy-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01388 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
rmbc-copy-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RMBC Copy Audit (Review-Pattern Transfer)
Purpose
Audit existing copy against the RMBC framework using a structured review process with severity triage, escalation gates, and actionable fix recommendations — modeled on code review methodology.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
copy_text |
Yes | The draft to audit (ad, VSL, email, landing page, advertorial) |
copy_type |
No | Format hint: ad, vsl, email, landing_page, advertorial. Default: auto-detect |
context |
No | Target audience, product, offer — improves Research scoring accuracy |
Audit Checklists
Research Checklist (R: 0-25)
- ICP identified with specificity (not "busy moms" but "DTC brand owners spending $50K+/mo on Meta")
- Pain points are specific and emotionally resonant
- Market awareness level matches audience sophistication
- Language mirrors how the audience actually talks
- Competitor landscape acknowledged (directly or implicitly)
Mechanism Checklist (M: 0-25)
- Novel explanation of WHY the product works exists
- Mechanism is specific (named, concrete, not vague science)
- Mechanism is believable (doesn't oversell)
- Mechanism differentiates from competitor claims
- Mechanism connects cause to promised effect
Brief Checklist (B: 0-25)
- Strategic angle is clear and singular (one big idea)
- Angle matches audience awareness level
- Offer positioning is explicit (what they get, what it costs, why now)
- Competitive differentiation present
- Emotional driver identified and leveraged
Copy Execution Checklist (C: 0-25)
- Lead/hook stops the scroll (first 2 lines earn the next 2)
- Proof elements present (specifics, testimonials, data)
- CTA is clear, single, and urgent
- Mobile-optimized (short paragraphs, scannable)
- Specificity over vagueness throughout (numbers, names, outcomes)
Audit Severity Levels
Rewrite (Critical)
- Missing mechanism entirely
- Wrong audience awareness level (pitching unaware audience with product-aware copy)
- No identifiable offer or CTA
- Fundamental angle mismatch (selling features to problem-aware audience)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 153 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A d8fe62d5a8f8
rmbc-copy-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository coleschaffer/copywritingskills-rmbc (30 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,388 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…