Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add collibra/chip --skill asset-creategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/collibra/chipWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/collibra/chip/asset-create)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/collibra/chip/asset-create"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/collibra/chip/asset-create/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/collibra/chip/asset-create"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/collibra/chip/asset-create.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01142 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00457 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
asset-create scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creating assets
create_asset is a single-call write tool that resolves human-friendly identifiers
server-side: assetType accepts UUID, publicId (e.g. "BusinessTerm"), or display name
(e.g. "Business Term"); domain accepts UUID or name; status accepts UUID or status
name; attributes reference attribute types by name or typeId. You almost never need to
pre-resolve any of these.
Hard rules
create_assetis self-sufficient. Do not callprepare_create_assetfirst by default.create_assetdoes its own resolution, validation, and duplicate check, and its error responses include suggestions for self-correction.- Write Markdown in RICH_TEXT attributes. Chip converts Markdown to HTML server-side for
any RICH_TEXT attribute (e.g.
Definition). Use**bold**,[links](url), lists, and headings naturally. Never pass HTML; never pre-render Markdown yourself. Seeshared/rich-text-markdown.mdfor the full rules. - Read the
statusfield in the response. Branch onsuccess,duplicate_found,validation_error, orerror— do not assume success.
Workflow
- Call
create_assetwithname,assetType(UUID, publicId, or display name),domain(UUID or name), optionalstatus, and optionalattributes. - Branch on the response
status:success— done. The response includes the new asset's UUID and a per-attribute outcome list. Report the UUID to the user.duplicate_found— an asset with the samenamealready exists in the resolved (assetType, domain). The response includes the existing asset's ID. Confirm with the user before retrying withallowDuplicate: true. Do not auto-retry — duplicates are usually a mistake.validation_error— the error message includes suggestions (available asset types, compatible domains, valid attribute names). Self-correct from the suggestions and retry. Only escalate to the user if a second attempt also fails.error— an unexpected downstream Collibra failure. Surface the message to the user; do not retry blindly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago Changed · +5 lines 93c39180a1b5
- 2mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a1ce295cef56
asset-create is a skill published in the GitHub repository collibra/chip (37 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,142 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
asset-create compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| asset-createcollibra/chip | Skill | 37 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |