Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cometchat/cometchat-skills/cometchat-flutter-v6-testingnpx skills add cometchat/cometchat-skills --skill cometchat-flutter-v6-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cometchat/cometchat-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cometchat/cometchat-skills/cometchat-flutter-v6-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cometchat/cometchat-skills/cometchat-flutter-v6-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cometchat/cometchat-skills/cometchat-flutter-v6-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00107 | $0.03040 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01520 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00608 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00304 |
Grade A, and why
cometchat-flutter-v6-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 320 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A a92189beec45
cometchat-flutter-v6-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository cometchat/cometchat-skills (99 stars, last pushed 29d ago), with no licence file. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 3,040 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-flutter
Flutter App のテスト実行・静的解析・フォーマット・テスト記述ガイド.
verify-work
Verify feature, bug, UI, API, mobile, security, or deployment work against acceptance criteria.
quality-engineering-appium-mcp
Drives iOS/Android mobile devices via Appium MCP. Use for verifying mobile bugs, E2E tests, and navigating real device clouds (LambdaTest/BrowserStack).
flutter-bloc-state-management
Implement BLoC/Cubit state, events, transitions, and async concurrency in Flutter. Use for BLoC/Cubit feature logic, debounced/cancellable events, state rendering, or bloc tests—not generic widget-only work.
ios-testing
Testing patterns for Swift and SwiftUI apps.
mobile-testing
Android and JVM testing - JUnit5, MockK, Turbine for Flow, and Compose UI testing for unit, integration, and UI tests; also applies to KMP commonTest running on the JVM/Android target. For iOS/Swift tests (XCTest, Swift Testing, XCUITest) use ios-testing. For TDD methodology and the three-tier test model (fake-first…