Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add companion-inc/introspect --skill visual-asset-remastergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/companion-inc/introspectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/companion-inc/introspect/visual-asset-remaster)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/companion-inc/introspect/visual-asset-remaster"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/companion-inc/introspect/visual-asset-remaster/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/companion-inc/introspect/visual-asset-remaster"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/companion-inc/introspect/visual-asset-remaster.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01041 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00416 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
visual-asset-remaster scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual Asset Remaster
When This Fires
Use this for image or animation asset work where quality depends on model choice, prompt strategy, alpha handling, or batch generation: pixelated mascots, sprite sheets, app icons, logo cleanup, transparent PNGs, upscaling, image edits, background removal, contact-sheet batching, and repacking assets into a runtime format.
Near misses: use ui-component-polish for UI layout/styling, product-surface-polish for store/pricing/marketing surfaces, and the built-in image generation flow for a single new image that does not need preservation, batching, or runtime integration.
Procedure
- Pin the asset contract before touching pixels: source files, renderer/consumer, expected dimensions, frame count, transparency rules, animation names/timing, and the exact visual qualities that must not change.
- Find the best source first. Search local files, repo history, archives, and public originals when the user asks for provenance; compare per-frame detail, not just total canvas size.
- Retrieve and validate provider credentials through
local-secret-retrievalwhen API calls are needed. A key's presence is not enough; run the smallest provider call that proves it works, without printing secret values. - Build a hard-case pilot matrix before a full batch. Infer acceptance criteria from the asset contract and the visible failure instead of asking the user to define obvious quality metrics. Use representative difficult assets: tiny eyes, thin lines, overlapping props, hands/wires/text, edge transparency, and any animation frames where drift is obvious. Include local baselines, true upscalers, image-edit/generative models, background-removal/matte options, and prompt/control variants.
- Treat "upscale" and "image edit/generation" as different hypotheses. True upscalers preserve identity but may smooth detail; edit/generation models can sharpen or beautify while moving geometry. Test both when quality demands it, then pick from evidence.
- Handle transparency deterministically. Inspect actual alpha channels; PNG output alone does not prove transparency. Do not send white matte into the final pipeline. Use filled RGB under transparent pixels, green/blue/chroma backgrounds, background removal, or original masks as experiments, then choose the final alpha source from measured/visual evidence.
- Judge with visual boards, not vibes. Make before/after boards, focused crops for the failure feature, alpha/checker previews, and per-animation review sheets. Metrics such as alpha IoU or pixel diff are secondary; reject outputs that preserve a number while moving eyes, silhouette, props, or timing.
- Scale only after the pilot passes. Checkpoint provider outputs, record provider/model/settings/prompt in the manifest, and prefer one-by-one generation when quality review matters more than throughput.
- Verify in the real runtime. Repack into the actual asset format, run structural tests/builds, launch or render through the consumer, inspect snapshots on transparent and real backgrounds, and review every animation or a per-animation board before calling the asset done.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 1151c003559e
visual-asset-remaster is a skill published in the GitHub repository companion-inc/introspect (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,041 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
visual-asset-remaster compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| visual-asset-remastercompanion-inc/introspect | Skill | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 82 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |