Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add compforge/devloop --skill validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compforge/devloopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/compforge/devloop/validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compforge/devloop/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compforge/devloop/validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compforge/devloop/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compforge/devloop/validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00577 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · +6 lines bd63f0e28d5b
- 12d ago Changed · -2 lines 58133fb9541a
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 0bc33fe6dbdf
- 1mo ago Changed · -16 lines 3a8b253b0f6c
- 1mo ago Changed · +22 lines bcaa9a274dc3
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines fb0fdec2245f
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 41289ae1627d
validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository compforge/devloop (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 577 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pwrl-testing
Comprehensive testing framework for micro-skill pipeline architecture validation, including unit, integration, compatibility tests, and consolidation audit.
hns-oss-docs-verify
Mandatory verify recipe for the oss-docs harness — the runnable exit gate every specialist executes before returning: warning-free hugo build, sitemap existence, URL-blacklist grep, Mermaid LR/RL direction grep, 4-locale file-existence and section-count parity, README 4-file heading parity, and body-emoji scan. All…
moai-ref-testing-pyramid
Test pyramid strategy, coverage targets, test patterns, and quality metrics reference. Agent-extending skill that amplifies manager-develop test-creation and quality-validation work with production-grade testing patterns. NOT for: production code implementation, architecture design, DevOps, security audits.
moai-foundation-quality
TRUST 5 quality principles and how MoAI enforces them through agents, the 3-level harness, /moai gate, and sync-auditor scoring. Use for code review, quality gate checks, coverage targets, or TRUST 5 compliance.
moai-workflow-loop
Ralph Engine - Automated feedback loop with LSP diagnostics and AST-grep integration for continuous code quality improvement. Use when implementing error-driven development, automated fixing, or continuous quality validation workflows.
moai-workflow-testing
Use when writing tests, measuring coverage, or running characterization, performance, or PR-review QA. Comprehensive specialist combining DDD testing, characterization tests, performance profiling, and TRUST 5 quality-assurance validation.