Composio is a software toolkit that gives AI agents access to authenticated tools for interacting with apps and services. Developers use its SDKs, command-line interface, sessions, and sandbox to build agents that can carry out actions. The catalogue add-ons support workflows for using Composio with coding agents.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-auditnpx skills add ComposioHQ/composio --skill good-docs-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.00255 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
good-docs-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Good docs audit
Review target documentation against the good-docs-writing rules and report where the writing drifts from that voice. Default behavior is report only: produce findings, do not edit. Only modify files if the user explicitly says to fix, rewrite, or apply.
Read references/audit-process.md for the procedure, the prioritized violation checklist, the report format, and the reporting rules.
Non-negotiables:
- Read
good-docs-writing(and itsreferences/style-guide.md) first. Those rules are the rubric; this skill is the process. - Cite
file:linefor every finding and quote the exact offending text. - Give a real rewrite in the target voice, not "consider revising."
- Don't invent violations. A short report is a good outcome.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 18 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 88728bfd431d
good-docs-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ComposioHQ/composio (30,055 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 255 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
final-release-review
Perform pre-release planning or a final release-candidate review for openai-agents-python by comparing the target with the previous remote tag, determining the minimum compatible release type, auditing regressions and contract changes, reviewing open documentation PR coverage, drafting minor-release Key Changes, and…
implementation-strategy
Choose compatibility-aware scope for runtime and API changes in openai-agents-python. Use before initial implementation and each review-feedback batch to decide whether to patch, reset the design, preserve compatibility, or reject unsupported cases.
pr-draft-summary
Create the required PR-ready summary block, branch suggestion, title, and draft description for openai-agents-python. Use before the final response whenever the current task changed runtime code, tests, examples, build/test configuration, or docs with behavior impact, regardless of perceived change size and including…
examples-run-analysis
Analyze artifacts from the latest completed manual examples Make run. Read the main log, every relevant per-example log, and example source; validate every exit-0 example and classify failures, skips, and environment restrictions. Never execute or control examples.
playwright
Use when the task requires capturing or automating a real browser from the terminal.
implementation-final-review
Perform the repository's risk-tiered independent final review before implementation completion. Use only when explicitly invoked or when repository instructions require it after behavior-impacting implementation work; audit the complete task diff, supported contracts, lifecycle and security boundaries, complexity, and…