good-docs-audit

good-docs-audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ComposioHQ/composio. It costs 82 tokens per session (255 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for checking documentation or other prose against a defined technical writing style.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a README, guide, document, or text block for voice, tone, structure, terminology, and formatting issues.
Why use it?
It finds specific style problems and provides replacement wording without changing the source by default.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to audit a README, guide, document, or text block for voice, tone, structure, terminology, and formatting issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit
About the project

Composio is a software toolkit that gives AI agents access to authenticated tools for interacting with apps and services. Developers use its SDKs, command-line interface, sessions, and sandbox to build agents that can carry out actions. The catalogue add-ons support workflows for using Composio with coding agents.

ComposioHQ/composio · 30,817 stars · on GitHub · docs.composio.dev

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ComposioHQ/composio --skill good-docs-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composio

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for good-docs-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for good-docs-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/composiohq/composio/good-docs-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 255 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00082 $0.00255
Opus 5.5 $0.00033 $0.00102
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00051
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00026

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 88728bfd431d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

good-docs-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/good-docs-audit/SKILL.md · 18 lines

What it actually says

Good docs audit

Review target documentation against the good-docs-writing rules and report where the writing drifts from that voice. Default behavior is report only: produce findings, do not edit. Only modify files if the user explicitly says to fix, rewrite, or apply.

Read references/audit-process.md for the procedure, the prioritized violation checklist, the report format, and the reporting rules.

Non-negotiables:

  • Read good-docs-writing (and its references/style-guide.md) first. Those rules are the rubric; this skill is the process.
  • Cite file:line for every finding and quote the exact offending text.
  • Give a real rewrite in the target voice, not "consider revising."
  • Don't invent violations. A short report is a good outcome.
Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 88728bfd431d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

good-docs-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ComposioHQ/composio (30,817 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 255 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Code review assistance with linting, style checking, and best practices.

agno-agi/agno · 16 tokens

advisor-orchestrator-worker

Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap…

Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · 100 tokens

python-design-pattern

Python design patterns and anti-patterns. Use when designing new components, refactoring, reviewing code for common mistakes, choosing abstractions, or evaluating pull requests for structural issues like tight coupling, leaking internal types, or error handling problems.

AI-Riksarkivet/ra-mcp · 51 tokens

python-engineering-guidelines

General Python engineering standards for writing, reviewing, and refactoring maintainable code. Use when Codex works on Python code, especially in medium/large projects, runtime adapters, APIs, SDK integrations, async services, stateful systems, or refactors where readability, explicit typing, module boundaries, side…

anywhere-labs/Agents-Anywhere · 75 tokens

ha-dev-workflow-apply

Applies and validates the HA code-style / strict-typing / validation workflow (spec/ha/dev-workflow) against an existing HA Custom Integration — Ruff format, ordered imports, f-strings (logging excepted), file-header docstrings, full type annotations, a local mypy-strict profile as the platinum strict-typing bridge…

nolte/claude-home-assistant · 212 tokens

coding-guidance-python

Python implementation and review skill. Use when writing, modifying, refactoring, or reviewing Python code, especially production Python that needs clear contracts, type safety, testability, and maintainable module boundaries. Portable across Python repos and tooling stacks.

n-n-code/n-n-code-skills · 53 tokens