Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to compozy/skeeper. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/compozy/skeeper/main/.agents/skills/architectural-analysis/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compozy/skeeperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/architectural-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/architectural-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/skeeper/architectural-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/architectural-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/skeeper/architectural-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.04431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01772 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00886 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00443 |
Grade A, and why
architectural-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to architectural-analysis — 651 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 646 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architectural Analysis
Instructions
Perform comprehensive architectural audit focused on structural issues, dead code, duplication, and systemic problems.
Phase 1: Discovery & Planning
Step 1: Map Codebase Structure
# Get directory structure
find . -type d -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"
# Count files by type
find . -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" | wc -l
Step 2: Identify Entry Points
- Main application entry (
index.ts,main.ts,app.ts) - API routes/controllers
- Public exports (
index.tsfiles) - CLI entry points
- Test files
Step 3: Create Comprehensive File List
Use Glob to find all source files. Create todo list with one item per file to analyze.
Phase 2: Dead Code Detection
For EACH file in the todo list:
Step 1: Identify Exports
- What does this file export?
- Are exports functions, classes, types, constants?
- Is anything exported at all?
Step 2: Search for Usage
For each export, search if it's imported/used anywhere:
# Search for imports of this export
grep -r "import.*ExportName" . --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx"
grep -r "from.*filename" . --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx"
# Search for direct usage
grep -r "ExportName" . --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx"
Step 3: Categorize Code
Dead Code (mark for removal):
- Exported but never imported
- Functions defined but never called
- Classes instantiated nowhere
- Types defined but never used
- Constants defined but never referenced
- Entire files with no imports from other files
Possibly Dead (needs verification):
- Only used in commented-out code
- Only used in dead code
- Only used in other unused exports
- Used only in tests for deprecated features
Internal Dead Code:
- Functions defined in file but never called (not exported)
- Variables assigned but never read
- Parameters accepted but never used
Step 4: Check for False Positives
Not dead if:
- Used in tests (may be public API)
- Dynamically imported/required
- Used via reflection/string references
- Part of public API (even if not used internally)
- Framework hooks (lifecycle methods, callbacks)
- Accessed via
windowor global scope
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 646 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A fc8746d270b9
architectural-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository compozy/skeeper (89 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 4,431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to architectural-analysis, differing in 651 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
gsd-ns-review
Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
superlint
This skill describes the mandatory standard operating procedure for using our internal SuperLint tool. Use this when tasks require fixing code quality issues according to corporate standards.