Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to compozy/skeeper. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/compozy/skeeper/main/.agents/skills/no-workarounds/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compozy/skeeperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/no-workarounds)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/no-workarounds"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/skeeper/no-workarounds/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/skeeper/no-workarounds"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/skeeper/no-workarounds.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.03036 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.01214 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00607 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00304 |
Grade A, and why
no-workarounds scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to no-workarounds — 389 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 385 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
No Workarounds
The Fundamental Law
A WORKAROUND IS A LIE TOLD TO THE COMPILER.
It makes the symptom disappear while the disease spreads.
A workaround is any change that makes a problem stop manifesting without addressing why the problem exists. Workarounds are not fixes. They are deferred failures with compound interest.
Philosophical foundation: Read references/philosophical-foundations.md for the engineering principles behind this skill, drawn from Toyota's Jidoka, Fowler's Technical Debt Quadrant, Torvalds' "good taste," and the Broken Windows Theory.
The Workaround Detection Gate
BEFORE writing or proposing ANY fix:
1. STATE the problem clearly
2. ASK: "Why does this problem exist?" (not "How do I make it stop?")
3. TRACE to root cause (use systematic-debugging skill)
4. ASK: "Does my proposed fix address the ROOT CAUSE?"
5. ASK: "Would this fix be necessary if the code were correct?"
6. ASK: "Am I silencing a signal or fixing a source?"
IF any answer reveals symptom-patching:
STOP — Redesign the fix to address root cause
IF root cause is in external code or truly unfixable:
Document why, add defensive validation, and mark with WORKAROUND comment
(See "The Escape Valve" section below)
The Seven Categories of Workarounds
Category 1 — TYPE: Type System Evasion
The signal being silenced: The type system is telling the code is wrong.
// WORKAROUND: Lying to the compiler
const value = response.data as UserProfile;
const config = {} as AppConfig;
function process(input: any) { ... }
// PROPER FIX: Make types truthful
const value: UserProfile | undefined = response.data;
if (!value) throw new Error("Missing user profile");
const config: AppConfig = { theme: "light", locale: "en" };
function process(input: UserProfile) { ... }
Gate function:
BEFORE using `as`, `any`, `unknown` cast, or `!` (non-null assertion):
Ask: "Why doesn't the type match?"
IF the data shape is genuinely unknown:
Use runtime validation (Schema, Zod, or type guards)
IF the type is wrong:
Fix the type definition
IF the API returns unexpected shape:
Fix the API contract or add a validation layer
NEVER use type assertions to bypass compiler errors
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 385 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 0ab376600ee7
no-workarounds is a skill published in the GitHub repository compozy/skeeper (89 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 3,036 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to no-workarounds, differing in 389 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
deck-retro
Run a fully local agent-deck retrospective over the user's own transcripts, Recall index and logs. Use when a user wants to find recurring failures or take their own finding from investigation through synthetic reproduction, a user-filed issue, a test-first fix and contributor PR handoff. Also use for weekly usage…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…