Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add conectlens/lenserfight --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conectlens/lenserfightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/conectlens/lenserfight/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conectlens/lenserfight/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conectlens/lenserfight/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conectlens/lenserfight/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conectlens/lenserfight/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00169 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pull Request Review Colens
A 4-node developer colens that takes a diff and produces a complete reviewer-ready report: a triage placement, a code review, suggested tests, and a clean PR description.
Suggested usage
Run via Chainabit's PR webhook integration or directly from the colens page. Inputs are the diff summary and the engineering goals of the current sprint.
Forkability
This colens is intentionally forkable. Teams routinely:
- Drop the
testsnode when the diff is a doc-only change. - Add a
validate-outputnode afterdescribeto enforce a house PR template. - Replace
code-reviewerwith a language-specific reviewer fork.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 21 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A aef6d17548f7
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository conectlens/lenserfight (18 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 169 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
core-workflow
Detailed development workflow patterns, checklists, and standards. Auto-loads for complex tasks, planning, debugging, testing, or when explicit patterns are needed. Contains session protocols, git conventions, security checklists, testing strategy, and communication standards.
contribute
Complete contribution workflow using git-town. Create branch → commit → PR → ship. Preflight at every step.
git-workflow
Git workflow and conventional commits. Use when working with git, branches, commits, pull requests, code review, or version control strategy.
trace-scan
Trace scan (§4.1/§4.2): before a commit, scans the staged changes and the message for AI traces (co-author trailers, footers, robot emoji, tool names) and vendor template names. The git hooks apply it automatically.
guardian
A guide for deciding how to organize commits, branches, merges, and pull requests. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review before it is merged.
security-pipeline
Use when security verification is needed - pre-commit security checks, vulnerability scanning, STRIDE threat analysis. Integrates with /handoff-verify --security and /commit-push-pr. CWE Top 25 based.