avoid-ai-writing is a portable writing skill that detects common patterns associated with AI-generated prose and can rewrite them or make targeted edits to prose files. It is for users of Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, and other compatible coding agents who want text to sound more like human writing. The catalogue entries are the skill's rule and instruction components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/false-positive-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/false-positive-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/false-positive-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/false-positive-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/false-positive-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00820 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00410 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
false-positive-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
False-Positive Reviewer
Interpret AI-writing signals without turning them into an unsupported authorship verdict.
Authority
Use the evidence caveats and pattern guidance in ../avoid-ai-writing/SKILL.md. The original Skill explicitly treats flags as writing-quality signals, not proof of who or what wrote the text.
For cross-Skill work, follow ../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/handoff-contract.md and ../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/skill-graph.json.
Connection contract
Incoming
Accept interpretation work from:
avoid-ai-writing-routerviaROUTEwhen the user directly asks for an authorship or consequential interpretation.ai-writing-detectorviaESCALATEwhen detector findings are being treated as proof.- any other Skill only through the router when the user's goal changes into a consequential authorship claim.
Preserve the distinction between:
- deterministic detector evidence,
- model-only editorial observations,
- contextual facts supplied by the user,
- evidence not yet available.
Produce
Update the handoff envelope only with interpretation-relevant state:
- keep
consequential_authorship_claim: truewhen applicable, - identify what the existing evidence can and cannot establish,
- list additional evidence that would materially reduce uncertainty,
- set a router-return reason if the user requests fresh signal collection or changes intent.
Do not rewrite detector scores, invent confidence values, or convert uncertainty into a probability of authorship.
Terminal behavior
This Skill has no direct outgoing Skill edge.
If fresh signal collection is genuinely needed, return control to avoid-ai-writing-router with fresh_signal_collection_needed. The router may run ai-writing-detector and then route the updated evidence back for interpretation if the user's request still requires it.
If the user separately asks to rewrite or edit the text, return control to the router with the new intent. Do not jump directly into rewrite or mutation from this Skill.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 80 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e83bead8603a
false-positive-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing (4,286 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 820 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
unmachined
Finds and removes AI slop from prose, UX copy, and web interfaces. Use when writing, auditing, or revising articles, posts, READMEs, marketing copy, UI copy, layouts, or frontend code that must not feel AI-generated; when the user says unmachined, de-slop, AI slop, anti-slop, humanize, make this human, sounds like AI…
compress
Prompt-Studio memory compressor. Shrinks CLAUDE.md, todo lists, and preference files into Prompt-Studio's lean format to cut input tokens on every load. Preserves all technical substance, code, URLs, and structure. Compressed output overwrites the original; human-readable backup stored out-of-tree as FILE.original.md…
lean-commit
Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes…
lean-gain
Show Lean's measured impact as a compact scoreboard: less code, more speed, from the benchmark medians. One-shot display, not a persistent mode, and not a per-repo number. Trigger: /lean-gain, "lean gain", "what does lean save", "show lean impact", "lean scoreboard".
lean-debt
Harvest every lean: comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals Lean leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "lean debt", "/lean-debt", "what did lean defer", "list the shortcuts", "lean ledger", or "what did we mark to do…
lean-help
Quick-reference card for all Lean modes, skills, and commands. One-shot display, not a persistent mode: shows the card and exits without switching levels, writing flag files, or persisting anything. Trigger: /lean-help, "lean help", "what lean commands", "how do I use lean", "lean cheatsheet", "lean reference".