Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add conorluddy/xclaude-plugin --skill simulator-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorluddy/xclaude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/simulator-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/simulator-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/simulator-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/simulator-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/simulator-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.03628 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01451 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00726 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00363 |
Grade A, and why
simulator-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 597 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Simulator Workflows
Use the execute_simulator_command MCP tool for all simulator management
The xclaude-plugin provides the execute_simulator_command MCP tool which consolidates all simctl operations into a single, token-efficient dispatcher.
⚠️ CRITICAL: Always Use MCP Tools First
This is the most important rule: When working with iOS simulators, you MUST use the execute_simulator_command MCP tool.
- ✅ DO: Invoke
execute_simulator_commandfor all device/app lifecycle operations - ✅ DO: If the MCP tool fails, adjust parameters and retry
- ✅ DO: Read error messages and debug the parameters
- ❌ NEVER: Fall back to bash
xcrun simctlcommands - ❌ NEVER: Use
simctldirectly in bash - ❌ NEVER: Run
xcrun simctlcommands in a terminal
Why? The MCP tool provides:
- Structured error handling
- Token efficiency (consolidated into 1 tool vs. verbose bash output)
- Proper integration with the xclaude-plugin architecture
- Consistent response formatting
If execute_simulator_command fails, the issue is with parameters or device state - not that you should use bash.
When to Use Bash (And When NOT to)
❌ NEVER Use Bash For These (Use MCP Tools Instead)
| Task | ❌ WRONG (Bash) | ✅ RIGHT (MCP Tool) |
|---|---|---|
| List devices | xcrun simctl list |
execute_simulator_command op: "list" |
| Boot simulator | xcrun simctl boot <UDID> |
execute_simulator_command op: "device-lifecycle" sub: "boot" |
| Install app | xcrun simctl install <UDID> <app.app> |
execute_simulator_command op: "app-lifecycle" sub: "install" |
| Launch app | xcrun simctl launch <UDID> <bundle-id> |
execute_simulator_command op: "app-lifecycle" sub: "launch" |
| Screenshot | xcrun simctl io <UDID> screenshot |
execute_simulator_command op: "io" sub: "screenshot" |
✅ Bash is Acceptable For (Non-Simulator Tasks)
- File operations:
mkdir,cp,rm,ls, etc. - Text inspection:
grep,find,cat, etc. - Git operations:
git status,git log, etc. - Environment checks:
which,simctl --version, etc. - Project exploration:
find . -name "*.app", etc.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 597 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 8dcd70c68f75
simulator-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository conorluddy/xclaude-plugin (184 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 3,628 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
argent-test-ui-flow
Autonomously test an app UI (iOS or Android) by running interact-screenshot-verify loops using argent MCP tools. Use when testing UI flows, verifying login works, testing navigation, running end-to-end UI test scenarios, manual QA steps, visible UI changes, or visual behavior.
test-native-extension
Validate a third-party control repo across four automated layers plus one printed manual recipe. Layer 1 asserts native-source structure (Android getName() and iOS +moduleName to manifest nativeModule; @ReactMethod / RCTEXPORTMETHOD to methods; no @ReactModule) plus load/init readiness (ReactPackage public no-arg…
argent-create-flow
Create, record, edit, replay, or repair reusable Argent flow YAML files. Use when the user asks to record or replay a repeatable device path, set up profiling or an A/B comparison, or invoke the authoring engine behind argent-qa-flows. Also use before repeating three or more interactions. For one-off UI checks…
argent-ios-device-interact
Drive a physical iPhone through argent. Use when a physical iPhone is involved (a list-devices iOS entry with kind "device") and ONLY then; never for a simulator. For cable, trust, or signing problems read argent-ios-device-setup.
argent-ios-device-setup
Set up a cabled physical iPhone for argent. Use when a physical iPhone is involved (a list-devices iOS entry with kind "device") and ONLY then; never for a simulator.
goga-accept-test-assessment
Cell test coverage assessment for acceptance review.