Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add conorluddy/xclaude-plugin --skill ui-automation-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorluddy/xclaude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/ui-automation-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/ui-automation-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/ui-automation-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/ui-automation-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/conorluddy/xclaude-plugin/ui-automation-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.02266 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00906 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
ui-automation-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 369 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI Automation Workflows
Use the execute_idb_command MCP tool for all UI automation
The xclaude-plugin provides the execute_idb_command MCP tool which consolidates all IDB UI automation operations into a single, token-efficient dispatcher.
⚠️ CRITICAL: Always Use MCP Tools First
This is the most important rule: When automating UI interactions, you MUST use the execute_idb_command MCP tool.
- ✅ DO: Invoke
execute_idb_commandfor all UI automation, element finding, and accessibility queries - ✅ DO: If the MCP tool fails, adjust parameters and retry
- ✅ DO: Read error messages and debug the parameters
- ❌ NEVER: Fall back to bash
idbcommands - ❌ NEVER: Use
idbdirectly in bash - ❌ NEVER: Run
idbcommands in a terminal
Why? The MCP tool provides:
- Structured error handling
- Token efficiency (consolidated into 1 tool vs. verbose bash output)
- Proper integration with the xclaude-plugin architecture
- Accessibility-first patterns built-in
If execute_idb_command fails, the issue is with parameters or app state - not that you should use bash.
Core Principle: Accessibility Before Screenshots
Always query the accessibility tree first. Only use screenshots as a fallback.
Use the execute_idb_command MCP tool with operation describe to access the accessibility tree.
Why Accessibility-First?
| Approach | Time | Tokens | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accessibility tree | ~120ms | ~50 | Survives theme changes |
| Screenshot | ~2000ms | ~170 | Breaks on visual changes |
Result: 3-4x faster, 80% cheaper, more reliable
Standard Workflow
1. Check Accessibility Quality (Optional) - Use execute_idb_command
Before starting automation, check if the app has good accessibility support:
Invoke the execute_idb_command MCP tool:
{
"operation": "check-accessibility",
"target": "booted"
}
Interprets:
- "excellent" or "good": Proceed with accessibility-first workflow
- "poor" or "insufficient": May need to rely more on screenshots
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 369 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 6cb35ef465db
ui-automation-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository conorluddy/xclaude-plugin (186 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 2,266 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-engineer
Automated E2E testing with Playwright including the auto-fix loop — generate test cases from the UI, run them, fix failures and re-run until passing, then produce a human-readable report. Test until it passes, not just test and report. Drives /toh-test; use whenever tests must be written, run, or made green.
runtime-verification
Verify code works at runtime through build verification (mandatory), LSP diagnostics, ad-hoc verification for projects without frameworks, E2E and smoke tests, and visual verification (screenshot-analyze-verify for UI changes). Skip whitelist strictly enforced (markdown-only, config-only, dependency-bump-only with…
visual-verification
Verify UI-facing changes by running a screenshot-analyze-verify loop across configured viewports, with a browser-tool priority cascade (Playwright MCP → Chrome DevTools MCP → CLI fallback → external skill fallback) and bounded iteration. Use after build/runtime verification passes and the diff includes…
parallel-lifecycle
Run and CDP-test a feature inside its own git worktree without colliding with other parallel coding sessions. Use whenever you are testing a feature locally in a worktree, running Playwright/CDP against your own app, or running two or more agent sessions in parallel that each need a dev server and a browser. Trigger…
e2e-testing
Use when writing or maintaining end-to-end tests — Playwright (preferred) or Cypress critical-flow suites. Pattern playbook: page objects, stable selectors, fixtures and isolation, condition-based waiting, flaky quarantine, CI wiring. Backs the e2e-runner agent.
e2e
Discover, operate, and incrementally extend a project's existing end-to-end test capability. Use when the user asks to run, check, inspect, or report E2E tests; validate a project or deployed environment end to end; identify E2E coverage gaps; or add and strengthen project-owned E2E cases. Follow project-owned tests…