Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add constellos/claude-code --skill pr-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/constellos/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/constellos/claude-code/pr-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/constellos/claude-code/pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/constellos/claude-code/pr-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/constellos/claude-code/pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/constellos/claude-code/pr-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01101 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00440 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
PR Workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Workflow
Complete PR lifecycle management with auto-generated descriptions from commits and issues.
Purpose
PR Workflow provides systematic pull request management with intelligent description generation, template selection based on work type, and automated review requests.
When to Use
- Creating PRs with auto-generated descriptions
- Using templates based on work type (feature/fix/chore/docs/refactor)
- Updating PR metadata (reviewers, labels, milestones)
- Managing PR lifecycle (draft → ready → merge)
Core Capabilities
PR Creation with Auto-Description
# Get commits since base branch
COMMITS=$(git log main..HEAD --oneline --no-decorate)
# Get linked issue
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
ISSUE=$(extractIssueNumber "$BRANCH")
# Generate description
DESC=$(generatePRDescription "$COMMITS" "$ISSUE")
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "Add authentication system" --body "$DESC"
Utilities:
generatePRDescription(commits, linkedIssue?)- Auto-generate from commitsgetPRTemplateByWorkType(workType)- Get template by typerenderPRTemplate(template, vars)- Substitute variablesgroupCommitsByType(commits)- Group by conventional commit typesformatGroupedCommits(grouped)- Format as sections
Template Selection
Templates automatically adapt to work type:
Feature PR:
## Summary
Brief overview
## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests
- [ ] Integration tests
## Related Issues
Closes #42
Bug Fix PR:
## Bug Fix
Brief description
## Root Cause
What caused it
## Solution
How we fixed it
## Testing
- [ ] Bug reproduced before fix
- [ ] Bug resolved after fix
Review Requests
# Auto-request reviewers from CODEOWNERS
OWNERS=$(grep "^$(dirname $FILE)" .github/CODEOWNERS | awk '{print $2}')
gh pr edit $PR --add-reviewer "$OWNERS"
# Or manually
gh pr edit $PR --add-reviewer @user1,@user2
PR Updates
# Update labels
gh pr edit 42 --add-label "enhancement,priority:high"
# Update milestone
gh pr edit 42 --milestone "v2.0"
# Convert to draft
gh pr ready --undo 42
# Mark ready for review
gh pr ready 42
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 32f86da71579
PR Workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository constellos/claude-code (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,101 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
PR Workflow compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR Workflowconstellos/claude-code | Skill | 5 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| prYeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode | Skill | 41k | today | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code |
| merge-batchdiegosouzapw/OmniRoute | Skill | 85k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| otto-pr-review-loopomnigent-ai/omnigent | Skill | 11k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| engram-branch-prGentleman-Programming/engram | Skill | 8.1k | today | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |
| github-contributordaymade/claude-code-skills | Skill | 1.5k | today | MIT | A | 105 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiffumputun/revdiff | Skill | 956 | today | MIT | A | 253 | Claude Code |