annotate-traces-for-review

annotate-traces-for-review is a skill for Claude Code from ContextJet-ai/awesome-llm-observability. It costs 105 tokens per session (787 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A setup for people to review and label the outputs recorded from an LLM or agent app. The labels can support error analysis and a trusted reference dataset.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review LLM outputs, annotate traces, investigate errors, and build a golden dataset for later testing.
Why use it?
It helps domain experts identify mistakes that automated checks may miss and turn those findings into review data.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the llm-observability plugin — 26 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review LLM outputs, annotate traces, investigate errors, and build a golden dataset for later testing.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ContextJet-ai/awesome-llm-observability --skill annotate-traces-for-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ContextJet-ai/awesome-llm-observability

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install llm-observability, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 26 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for annotate-traces-for-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for annotate-traces-for-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability/annotate-traces-for-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 105 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 787 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00105 $0.00787
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.00394
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00157
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00079

Measured 12d ago against content hash d5d1ea3b7a59, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

annotate-traces-for-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/annotate-traces-for-review/SKILL.md · 46 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 46 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A d5d1ea3b7a59

Subscribe to this mod's changes

annotate-traces-for-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ContextJet-ai/awesome-llm-observability (33 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 787 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.