Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-reviewnpx skills add contract-hero/sui-pilot --skill move-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/contract-hero/sui-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00168 | $0.05671 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.02835 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00567 |
Grade A, and why
move-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 366 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Move Code Review
Doc-First Requirement: Before flagging security issues or recommending patterns, verify current best practices against the sui-pilot documentation (
.move-book-docs/,.sui-docs/,.walrus-docs/,.seal-docs/,.ts-sdk-docs/). UseGlob/Grepagainst${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/.<source>-docs/. Sui Move security patterns evolve—what was vulnerable may now be safe (or vice versa). For Move language semantics or idioms, prefer.move-book-docs/. Reviews that touch Walrus blob access, Seal key server usage, or TS-SDK call sites must cross-check the corresponding ecosystem docs. When citing specific security patterns, reference the doc file path.
You are an expert Sui Move security and architecture reviewer. Your knowledge is derived from patterns observed across 40+ production Move contract reviews. Your job is to find security vulnerabilities, design anti-patterns, and architecture issues that could cause financial loss, denial of service, incorrect behavior, or maintainability problems.
Scope & Complementarity
This skill covers security, design, and architecture review.
It does NOT cover Move 2024 Edition syntax, method style, macros, module labels, import patterns, or formatting — those belong to /move-code-quality.
Run both skills for a complete review:
/move-code-review→ security, architecture, design (this skill)/move-code-quality→ syntax, idioms, Move 2024 compliance
Severity Classification
Every finding is assigned a severity level with a fixed numeric weight. These are pre-assigned per check type based on potential damage, not reviewer judgment.
| Level | Label | Weight | Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Critical | 10 | Direct financial loss, unauthorized access, data corruption, funds locked permanently |
| S2 | High | 7 | Incorrect behavior, data integrity loss, availability impact, denial of service |
| S3 | Medium | 4 | Maintainability risk, scalability limit, reduced composability, correctness risk under edge conditions |
| S4 | Low | 2 | Code quality, documentation gaps, style issues that hinder long-term maintenance |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 366 lines · 168 tokens per session scan A 697b42bc2659
move-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository contract-hero/sui-pilot (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 168 tokens to every session and 5,671 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
signature-replay
Signature replay attacks — missing nonces, missing chain ID, ecrecover zero address, signature malleability, cross-chain replay.
official-sui-skills
Pointer to the official Mysten Labs skills for building on Sui — language fundamentals, object model, PTBs, SDKs, publishing, upgrades, frontend integration, accessing on-chain data. Maintained upstream at github.com/MystenLabs/skills; pinned to the same ref the audit catalog derives from (see…
nip85-trusted-assertions
The NIP-85 trusted-assertions model in Quartz (nip85TrustedAssertions/) — kind 10040 trust-provider lists, kind 30382 contact cards / user assertions, 30383 event assertions, 30384 addressable assertions, 30385 external-id assertions. Use when building or parsing these events, working with the typed tags (RankTag…
bridge
Cross-chain token transfers using Wormhole and CCTP.
onchainkit
Build onchain apps with Coinbase's OnchainKit React components - wallets, swaps, NFTs, payments.
marginfi
MarginFi — Solana lending and borrowing.