research-to-ship

research-to-ship is a skill for Claude Code from cookys/autopilot. It costs 168 tokens per session (1,872 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

A guided workflow that turns research about a topic into an approved plan, a tracked project, and completed development work.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps research industry practices, write and review a plan, create project tracking, and run the development workflow, pausing for human approval between phases.
Why use it?
Research, planning, review, and implementation can otherwise happen out of order or without clear approval points.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: dynamic context !`command`. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is Routing overlap? If this intent better matches a sibling skill, redirect per [references/routing-tiebreaks.md](../../references/routing-tiebreaks.md) (prefer hu.

Part of the autopilot plugin — 33 skills, 3 agents, 7 hooks shipped together

Good fit It helps research industry practices, write and review a plan, create project tracking, and run the development workflow, pausing for human approval between phases.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cookys/autopilot
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install autopilot, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills, 3 agents, 7 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for research-to-ship

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for research-to-ship

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cookys/autopilot/research-to-ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 168 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,872 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00168 $0.01872
Opus 5 $0.00084 $0.00936
Sonnet 5 $0.00034 $0.00374
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00187

Measured 5d ago against content hash a2c042736495, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

research-to-ship scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

!`cat .claude/dispatch-config.md 2>/dev/null || true`
platforms/codex/plugin/skills/research-to-ship/SKILL.md · 113 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

research-to-ship — a topic → researched, reviewed, shipped

Routing overlap? If this intent better matches a sibling skill, redirect per references/routing-tiebreaks.md (prefer human-gated pipelines over full autonomy).

A pinned chain that fixes the sequence and the human gates; the real work is delegated to existing autopilot skills. It exists because that exact sequence (best-practice research → plan → bounded plan-readiness gate → project → dev-flow) is a recurring ritual worth one command instead of re-typing each time.

Dispatch Chains (auto-injected)

!cat .claude/dispatch-config.md 2>/dev/null || true

Input — the topic

The objective/topic is whatever the user passed after the command. If it is empty, ask for it in one line before starting. Derive a kebab-case <slug> from it for the plan/project filenames.

The pipeline (Phase 0 optional, then 5 phases, a human gate between each)

Run the phases in order. At each gate, use AskUserQuestion and do not proceed until the user approves — this is what keeps the flow participatory (the opposite of ceo-agent's full autonomy).

Phase 0 — (optional) discover the design · delegate → autopilot:brainstorm

Only when the topic starts fuzzy — the options don't exist yet. If the user hands a vague need ("not sure how to approach X / 還沒想清楚"), run autopilot:brainstorm first: Socratic exploration → 2-3 approaches → a design spec the user approves. Then carry the chosen approach into Phase 1. Skip Phase 0 when the topic is already a clear question (most invocations) — go straight to Phase 1. Gate (only if Phase 0 ran): "design approved — research best-practice for it?"

Phase 1 — Research best-practice · delegate → autopilot:survey

Invoke autopilot:survey on the topic for external best-practice (dual researcher + skeptic). If the topic needs deep, multi-source, fact-checked synthesis, use deep-research instead. Gate: present the synthesized findings → "research enough to plan, or dig deeper / redirect?"

Read the full file on GitHub · 113 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago Changed · +2 lines a2c042736495
  2. 10d ago First seen · 111 lines · 168 tokens per session scan B 6f0814576c96

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-to-ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository cookys/autopilot (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 168 tokens to every session and 1,872 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens