Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills --skill contract-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00412 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00165 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Contract Review
Review and negotiate contracts effectively.
Key Clauses to Watch
Liability & Indemnification
- Limitation of Liability: Cap at contract value (not revenue)
- Indemnification: Who pays if something goes wrong
- Mutuality: Both sides should have same protections
- Exclusions: What's NOT limited (IP infringement, death/injury)
Termination
- For cause: Breach + cure period (30 days standard)
- For convenience: Without cause, 30-90 days notice
- Termination fee: Breakage costs if early termination
- Survival: Which clauses survive termination (confidentiality, IP)
IP Ownership
- Work for hire: Company owns deliverables
- Pre-existing IP: Clearly listed and excluded
- License grant: What rights does each party get?
- Improvements: Who owns modifications to pre-existing IP?
Contract Types
| Type | Use | Key Terms |
|---|---|---|
| MSA | Ongoing services | Scope, pricing, liability |
| SOW | Specific projects | Deliverables, timeline, acceptance |
| NDA | Confidential information | Definition, term, exclusions |
| SaaS | Software access | SLA, data, uptime |
| Contractor | Services | IP, independence, termination |
Redlining Best Practices
- Start with friendly language, escalate if needed
- Explain WHY you want each change
- Focus on high-risk clauses first
- Get everything in writing (email is sufficient)
- Know your walk-away points before negotiating
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A e929f2ae046a
contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills (487 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 412 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
play-policy-insights
Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and…
crisis-holding
Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).
aade-api-monitor
Real-time monitoring of Greek AADE tax authority systems — tracks deadlines, rate changes, and compliance updates. File-based, OpenClaw-native.
commerce-app-review
Use when validating an App Builder app before submitting to Adobe Exchange, or when the user mentions Adobe Commerce app compliance, extension review, marketplace submission, or Adobe Exchange listing. Checks security requirements, project structure, documentation completeness, and dependency health; reports MUST-have…
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…
ai-usage-policy
Write an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy…