Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills --skill reportsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills/reports)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills/reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills/reports/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills/reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills/reports.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00136 | $0.06995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.03497 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00700 |
Grade A, and why
reports scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 454 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reports
Skill body version 0.5.2. Workflows here are named — Schedule, Explain, Update, Run, Explore. Older bodies lettered them A–E, and other Costory surfaces used a different letter order. If you are holding a lettered routing table for reports, it is stale: route by the names in this body and ignore the letters.
A report has a shared reportContext input (global theme) and widgets that inherit it by default. It delivers those widgets (chart snapshot, PDF, top/flop, text, or DIGEST cost-change tree) to one or more destinations (Slack, Teams, email). Same mental model as dashboards: shared context + per-widget overrides. create_report, update_report, and preview_report_widget all take the same report-level reportContext.
Temporary compatibility: the deprecated top-level
contextalias is accepted during migration, but always generatereportContext. Never send both.
Load this skill first for any report creation, DIGEST preview, substantial update, or delivery conversation.
Must-follow rules
Everything below this section is detail. These eight are the contract:
- Ask before build (Schedule / delivery). Do not pick widgets, call
preview_report_widget, or callcreate_reportuntil the design is confirmed. Never silently default to a graph or an AI summary on Schedule. - Explain exception — preview-first DIGEST. For one-shot "what changed / explain last month" (Explain workflow or
explain-period-changerecipe), defaulting to DIGEST chat preview is required. Do not wait for a full design questionnaire; do not substitutequery+comparefor the first answer. - Context-first. Once answers are in, define the full
reportContextbefore listing widgets. Widgets carry only overrides — never duplicate what already lives inreportContext. - Destinations last. Do not call
list_available_destinationsuntil the user has named the channel type (Slack / Teams / email). Then list only that type and propose matches by name — never paste a whole channel list into the conversation. - AI features are opt-in. DIGEST-only. Set
display: "summary"for the executive narrative and/orenableAiInvestigation: truefor per-node deep analysis — both default off (tree-only) and are slower. - Confirm delivery. Both
NOWandSCHEDULEDneed explicit confirmation beforecreate_report.UNSCHEDULEDdoes not. datePreset, never frozen dates, onSCHEDULEDreports.- Cost data is ~2 days late. Prefer a Tuesday weekly send (
weekday: 2) when the period isLAST_WEEK(a completed calendar week). If the report must land earlier (e.g. Monday), useTRAILING_7_DAYSinstead ofLAST_WEEKso the window is not a half-empty calendar week.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 454 lines · 136 tokens per session scan A 434f9cd89b8f
reports is a skill published in the GitHub repository costory-io/costory-finops-mcp-skills (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 136 tokens to every session and 6,995 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
terraform-infrastructure-as-code
Comprehensive Terraform Infrastructure as Code skill covering resources, modules, state management, workspaces, providers, and advanced patterns for cloud-agnostic infrastructure deployment.
auditing-gcp-iam-permissions
Auditing Google Cloud Platform IAM permissions to identify overly permissive bindings, primitive role usage, service account key proliferation, and cross-project access risks using gcloud CLI, Policy Analyzer, and IAM Recommender.
detecting-s3-data-exfiltration-attempts
Detecting data exfiltration attempts from AWS S3 buckets by analyzing CloudTrail S3 data events, VPC Flow Logs, GuardDuty findings, Amazon Macie alerts, and S3 access patterns to identify unauthorized bulk downloads and cross-account data transfers.
implementing-cloud-trail-log-analysis
Implementing AWS CloudTrail log analysis for security monitoring, threat detection, and forensic investigation using Athena, CloudWatch Logs Insights, and SIEM integration to identify unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and suspicious API activity.
performing-aws-privilege-escalation-assessment
Performing authorized privilege escalation assessments in AWS environments to identify IAM misconfigurations that allow users or roles to elevate their permissions using Pacu, CloudFox, Principal Mapper, and manual IAM policy analysis techniques.
performing-cloud-log-forensics-with-athena
Uses AWS Athena to query CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, S3 access logs, and ALB logs for forensic investigation. Covers CREATE TABLE DDL with partition projection, forensic SQL queries for detecting unauthorized access, data exfiltration, lateral movement, and privilege escalation. Use when investigating AWS security…