Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/ask-questions-if-underspecifiednpx skills add CraftOS-dev/CraftBot --skill ask-questions-if-underspecifiedgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CraftOS-dev/CraftBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/ask-questions-if-underspecified)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/ask-questions-if-underspecified"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/ask-questions-if-underspecified.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00878 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
ask-questions-if-underspecified scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to ask-questions-if-underspecified — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ask Questions If Underspecified
When to Use
Use this skill when a request has multiple plausible interpretations or key details (objective, scope, constraints, environment, or safety) are unclear.
When NOT to Use
Do not use this skill when the request is already clear, or when a quick, low-risk discovery read can answer the missing details.
Goal
Ask the minimum set of clarifying questions needed to avoid wrong work; do not start implementing until the must-have questions are answered (or the user explicitly approves proceeding with stated assumptions).
Workflow
1) Decide whether the request is underspecified
Treat a request as underspecified if after exploring how to perform the work, some or all of the following are not clear:
- Define the objective (what should change vs stay the same)
- Define "done" (acceptance criteria, examples, edge cases)
- Define scope (which files/components/users are in/out)
- Define constraints (compatibility, performance, style, deps, time)
- Identify environment (language/runtime versions, OS, build/test runner)
- Clarify safety/reversibility (data migration, rollout/rollback, risk)
If multiple plausible interpretations exist, assume it is underspecified.
2) Ask must-have questions first (keep it small)
Ask 1-5 questions in the first pass. Prefer questions that eliminate whole branches of work.
Make questions easy to answer:
- Optimize for scannability (short, numbered questions; avoid paragraphs)
- Offer multiple-choice options when possible
- Suggest reasonable defaults when appropriate (mark them clearly as the default/recommended choice; bold the recommended choice in the list, or if you present options in a code block, put a bold "Recommended" line immediately above the block and also tag defaults inside the block)
- Include a fast-path response (e.g., reply
defaultsto accept all recommended/default choices) - Include a low-friction "not sure" option when helpful (e.g., "Not sure - use default")
- Separate "Need to know" from "Nice to know" if that reduces friction
- Structure options so the user can respond with compact decisions (e.g.,
1b 2a 3c); restate the chosen options in plain language to confirm
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 86 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A fef9189249c4
ask-questions-if-underspecified is a skill published in the GitHub repository CraftOS-dev/CraftBot (378 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 878 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to ask-questions-if-underspecified, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
turix-mac
Computer Use Agent (CUA) for macOS automation using TuriX. Use when you need to perform visual tasks on the desktop, such as opening apps, clicking buttons, or navigating UIs that don't have a CLI or API.
macos-control
Control macOS GUI applications via mouse automation, keyboard input, screenshots, image recognition, and AppleScript execution. Use when you need to interact with macOS app UIs, take screenshots, click buttons, type text, scroll, drag, or locate images on screen.
artifact-storage-policy
管理 Codex 交付物的專案識別、Google Drive/GitHub 路由、檔名、儲存位置與回讀驗證;凡工作報告、外部保存、交付成果或新 repository 選擇涉及遠端儲存時使用。.
model-worker-routing
Route a task to the existing Ox Alpha worker only when the user explicitly names Ox Alpha; preserve normal Codex behavior for all other tasks.
output-contract
任務完成前需要一致交付格式、修改清單、測試結果、待確認事項、或使用者明確要求「完成後列出」時使用。適用於程式碼、設定、文件、skills、同步與多步驟任務收尾;本 Skill 不取代內容 readiness 或風險檢查。.
prompt-portability
需要把 Codex / Claude 的全域規則、skill 原則、工作流程或提示詞移植到 Gemini、ChatGPT、Claude 網頁版、API、或其他不具備本機檔案修改能力的平台時使用。.