Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/differential-reviewnpx skills add CraftOS-dev/CraftBot --skill differential-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CraftOS-dev/CraftBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/differential-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/differential-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/differential-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.01664 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00832 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00333 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
differential-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to differential-review — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Differential Security Review
Security-focused code review for PRs, commits, and diffs.
Core Principles
- Risk-First: Focus on auth, crypto, value transfer, external calls
- Evidence-Based: Every finding backed by git history, line numbers, attack scenarios
- Adaptive: Scale to codebase size (SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE)
- Honest: Explicitly state coverage limits and confidence level
- Output-Driven: Always generate comprehensive markdown report file
Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| "Small PR, quick review" | Heartbleed was 2 lines | Classify by RISK, not size |
| "I know this codebase" | Familiarity breeds blind spots | Build explicit baseline context |
| "Git history takes too long" | History reveals regressions | Never skip Phase 1 |
| "Blast radius is obvious" | You'll miss transitive callers | Calculate quantitatively |
| "No tests = not my problem" | Missing tests = elevated risk rating | Flag in report, elevate severity |
| "Just a refactor, no security impact" | Refactors break invariants | Analyze as HIGH until proven LOW |
| "I'll explain verbally" | No artifact = findings lost | Always write report |
Quick Reference
Codebase Size Strategy
| Codebase Size | Strategy | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| SMALL (<20 files) | DEEP | Read all deps, full git blame |
| MEDIUM (20-200) | FOCUSED | 1-hop deps, priority files |
| LARGE (200+) | SURGICAL | Critical paths only |
Risk Level Triggers
| Risk Level | Triggers |
|---|---|
| HIGH | Auth, crypto, external calls, value transfer, validation removal |
| MEDIUM | Business logic, state changes, new public APIs |
| LOW | Comments, tests, UI, logging |
Workflow Overview
Pre-Analysis → Phase 0: Triage → Phase 1: Code Analysis → Phase 2: Test Coverage
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Phase 3: Blast Radius → Phase 4: Deep Context → Phase 5: Adversarial → Phase 6: Report
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 229 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 1499d68ed446
differential-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository CraftOS-dev/CraftBot (376 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,664 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to differential-review, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
turix-mac
Computer Use Agent (CUA) for macOS automation using TuriX. Use when you need to perform visual tasks on the desktop, such as opening apps, clicking buttons, or navigating UIs that don't have a CLI or API.
macos-control
Control macOS GUI applications via mouse automation, keyboard input, screenshots, image recognition, and AppleScript execution. Use when you need to interact with macOS app UIs, take screenshots, click buttons, type text, scroll, drag, or locate images on screen.
artifact-storage-policy
管理 Codex 交付物的專案識別、Google Drive／GitHub 路由、檔名、儲存位置與回讀驗證；凡工作報告、外部保存、交付成果或新 repository 選擇涉及遠端儲存時使用。.
model-worker-routing
Route a task to the existing Ox Alpha worker only when the user explicitly names Ox Alpha; preserve normal Codex behavior for all other tasks.
output-contract
任務完成前需要一致交付格式、修改清單、測試結果、待確認事項、或使用者明確要求「完成後列出」時使用。適用於程式碼、設定、文件、skills、同步與多步驟任務收尾；本 Skill 不取代內容 readiness 或風險檢查。.
prompt-portability
需要把 Codex / Claude 的全域規則、skill 原則、工作流程或提示詞移植到 Gemini、ChatGPT、Claude 網頁版、API、或其他不具備本機檔案修改能力的平台時使用。.