Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/sarif-parsingnpx skills add CraftOS-dev/CraftBot --skill sarif-parsinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CraftOS-dev/CraftBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/sarif-parsing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/sarif-parsing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/sarif-parsing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.03735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01868 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00747 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
sarif-parsing scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
from urllib.parse import unquote This is a copy
94% identical to sarif-parsing — 55 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 493 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SARIF Parsing Best Practices
You are a SARIF parsing expert. Your role is to help users effectively read, analyze, and process SARIF files from static analysis tools.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Reading or interpreting static analysis scan results in SARIF format
- Aggregating findings from multiple security tools
- Deduplicating or filtering security alerts
- Extracting specific vulnerabilities from SARIF files
- Integrating SARIF data into CI/CD pipelines
- Converting SARIF output to other formats
When NOT to Use
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Running static analysis scans (use CodeQL or Semgrep skills instead)
- Writing CodeQL or Semgrep rules (use their respective skills)
- Analyzing source code directly (SARIF is for processing existing scan results)
- Triaging findings without SARIF input (use variant-analysis or audit skills)
SARIF Structure Overview
SARIF 2.1.0 is the current OASIS standard. Every SARIF file has this hierarchical structure:
sarifLog
├── version: "2.1.0"
├── $schema: (optional, enables IDE validation)
└── runs[] (array of analysis runs)
├── tool
│ ├── driver
│ │ ├── name (required)
│ │ ├── version
│ │ └── rules[] (rule definitions)
│ └── extensions[] (plugins)
├── results[] (findings)
│ ├── ruleId
│ ├── level (error/warning/note)
│ ├── message.text
│ ├── locations[]
│ │ └── physicalLocation
│ │ ├── artifactLocation.uri
│ │ └── region (startLine, startColumn, etc.)
│ ├── fingerprints{}
│ └── partialFingerprints{}
└── artifacts[] (scanned files metadata)
Why Fingerprinting Matters
Without stable fingerprints, you can't track findings across runs:
- Baseline comparison: "Is this a new finding or did we see it before?"
- Regression detection: "Did this PR introduce new vulnerabilities?"
- Suppression: "Ignore this known false positive in future runs"
Tools report different paths (/path/to/project/ vs /github/workspace/), so path-based matching fails. Fingerprints hash the content (code snippet, rule ID, relative location) to create stable identifiers regardless of environment.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 493 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 7ce510b54a35
sarif-parsing is a skill published in the GitHub repository CraftOS-dev/CraftBot (380 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 3,735 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 94% identical to sarif-parsing, differing in 55 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
atmos-profiles
Atmos profiles: profile directories, --profile and ATMOSPROFILE activation, profile merge behavior, environment switching, and routing profile-specific auth/toolchain/config overrides.
webhook-management
Configure and validate CCAM webhook targets across supported chat, incident, automation, and generic providers. Use when listing provider requirements, creating or updating a target, scoping it to alert rules, sending a test notification, reviewing delivery history, or deleting a target.
managing-github-actions-secrets
Creates and updates GitHub Actions secrets for PostHog workflows. Use when adding a new CI secret, rotating an existing secret, wiring a workflow to an API token, package registry credential, deploy key, or any value referenced via ${{ secrets. }} in .github/workflows/.
watch-ci
Monitor GitHub Actions CI runs until completion. Use when: watching CI after push, checking build status, monitoring PR checks, waiting for CI completion, user says 'watch CI', 'check CI', 'CI status', 'monitor build', or /watch-ci. Not for: pushing code (use push-ci), creating PRs (use create-pr). Output: per-run…
ci-cd
GitHub Actions CI/CD 파이프라인 설계 및 자동화.
ci-triage
Diagnose a failing GitHub Actions run — find the first real error in the logs, tell a flake apart from a genuine failure, and identify the commit that broke it. Use when checks are red on a PR, a workflow failed, the build is broken, CI is flaky, or the user asks why a run failed or whether a failure is real.