Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl --skill stress-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/stress-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/stress-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/stress-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/stress-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/stress-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.01141 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00055 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
stress-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stress testing — load, spike, soak, breakpoint
Load testing answers questions about a system under traffic. There is no single "stress test" — there are six test types, each answering one question, and the discipline is picking the right question, modeling realistic load, and judging by percentiles against a declared SLO.
Hard rule: explicitly requested only
Never run, schedule, or "quickly check" a load test on your own initiative. Load tests consume real resources and can degrade or take down the target — especially shared/staging environments. This skill activates only when the user asks for it, against a target the user names. Before any run, confirm: the target environment (never production unless the user explicitly says so and owns that decision), and that the user accepts the load about to be generated.
Read first (always)
List learnings/ — the project's SLOs, tooling, environments, past baselines, and known bottlenecks live there and override defaults here.
The six types (pick by the question — references/test-types.md)
| Type | Question | When |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke | Does the script and system work at all? | Always first; <5 VUs, minutes |
| Average-load | Does it handle normal production traffic? | The baseline; before any other heavy type |
| Stress | Does it handle the peak (50–100%+ above normal)? | Before high-traffic events |
| Spike | Does it survive a sudden surge? | Before launches/campaigns |
| Breakpoint | Where and how does it break? | Periodically, for capacity planning |
| Soak | Does it degrade over time (leaks, pools, disk)? | After significant changes; hours/days |
Golden order: smoke → average-load → only then stress/spike/soak/breakpoint. Stressing a system never validated at average load produces noise — you can't tell whether the peak broke it or it never handled normal traffic.
Workflow
- Define pass/fail before generating load. SLO-derived thresholds, declared in the tool (e.g. k6):
http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01']. Percentiles, never averages. No SLO? Derive a provisional one from current production percentiles (observability.md) and say so. - Model the workload realistically (
references/workload-modeling.md): traffic-based scenario mix, parameterized data, human pacing, open model (arrival rate) for request-driven systems — and know the coordinated-omission trap. - Confirm target + environment with the user, sized realistically (data volume matters: problems hide at 1k rows and surface at 1M — see
data-layer.md). - Run smoke, then the chosen type. Observability on during the run (metrics/traces tell you why; the test only tells you that).
- Interpret (
references/interpreting-results.md): thresholds pass/fail, the latency distribution, the knee of the curve, what saturated first, graceful vs catastrophic failure. - Record the baseline in
learnings/— a load test without a previous baseline to compare against is half a test.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A d356bcdac5eb
stress-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 1,141 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-testing
Run QA testing on a page, feature, or full site at one of three depth tiers (smoke, standard, full). Use this skill whenever the user asks to QA a page or site, run a smoke test after a deploy, verify a page before launch, or run a regression sweep. Triggers on QA, QA sweep, smoke test, regression test, post-deploy…
visual-qa
Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces: an Apple HIG-based checklist, paired light/dark captures at phone and desktop widths, screenshot evidence, and a per-item PASS/FAIL verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right or follows the…
remove-ai-slops
Removes AI-generated code smells from branch changes or an explicit file list behind regression tests. Use when the user asks to clean up, deslop, or remove AI-slop patterns from recent changes.
senpi-qa
QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/ /. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPICODINGAGENTDIR and…
test-coverage-improver
Analyze test coverage gaps and generate tests to improve coverage. Use when improving test coverage, finding untested code, or writing missing tests.
browser-test-loop
Use to actually verify a web change in a real browser instead of assuming it works — click through a flow, catch console errors, check a form submits, confirm a fix on the page. Trigger when a UI change needs proof, a bug only reproduces in the browser, or the user asks to test, check, or screenshot the running app.