Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills --skill content-moderation-apigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills/content-moderation-api)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills/content-moderation-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills/content-moderation-api/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills/content-moderation-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills/content-moderation-api.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00803 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
content-moderation-api scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Content Moderation API
Purpose
Detects absence of a content moderation service integration for apps that accept user-uploaded media or posts, enforcing Guideline 1.2's requirement for timely response to content reports.
Apple Guideline
- Primary: 1.2 — Safety: User Generated Content
- Related: 5.1.1(ii)
- Reference:
references/guidelines/1-safety.md
Real-World Rejection Cases
-
Case: Image-sharing app with no content moderation — reviewer uploaded test image, flagged as objectionable, no moderation response Source: Apple Developer Forums Root cause: 1.2 requires timely response to content reports; no moderation backend means inability to comply — reviewer demonstrated the gap by submitting a test report with no visible effect
-
Case: Video sharing app rejected — users could upload videos that were immediately public with no pre-publication moderation or post-report takedown mechanism Source: Apple Developer Forums (Guideline 1.2 rejection threads, multiple reports 2022–2023) Root cause: For video/media UGC apps, Apple expects either pre-publication screening or a visible and functional post-publication reporting mechanism with timely follow-through. Guideline 1.2 explicitly states apps must "have a mechanism for users to flag objectionable content" and "take action against objectionable content."
-
Case: Social app had a moderation backend but it only processed text content — profile photos and user bio fields had no moderation — rejected Source: Apple Developer Forums (Guideline 1.2 rejection threads) Root cause: Guideline 1.2 compliance applies to all user-generated surfaces in the app, not only the primary feed. Reviewers test all UGC vectors including profile photos, bios, and display names. Partial coverage of only one content type is insufficient.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 131 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 7ee475e6daf5
content-moderation-api is a skill published in the GitHub repository cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills (16 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,606 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
benchmark
Run performance + quality benchmarks. ASR reports WER, RTF, process memory, and throughput across engines/variants. Arguments include asr, tts, vad, diarize, asr-quick.
review-pr
Review a pull request for conceptual fit, architecture impact, adversarial failure modes, security risk, docs impact, regression risk, test coverage, and merge readiness. Use when asked to review a PR, check whether a PR is safe to merge, decide if more tests are needed, perform adversarial or security review, or…
boutique-best-practices
Best practices for using Boutique with Swift 6 concurrency, @Observable, @ObservationIgnored, Sendable conformance, testing with preview stores, and dependency injection. Use when troubleshooting Boutique issues, migrating to Swift 6, or setting up tests.
boutique-store
Create and use Boutique Store for Swift data persistence, including initialization, @Stored controllers, CRUD operations, operation chaining, and granular event monitoring. Use when persisting arrays of items, building data controllers, or working with Boutique's Store type.
boutique-stored-values
Persist individual values with Boutique's @StoredValue (UserDefaults) and @SecurelyStoredValue (Keychain), including set, reset, toggle, bindings, keypath setters, array and dictionary helpers, and async observation. Use when storing preferences, settings, feature flags, or sensitive data like auth tokens.
boutique-swiftui
Integrate Boutique with SwiftUI views using onChange, onStoreDidLoad, bindings, and preview stores. Use when building SwiftUI views that display or react to Boutique-persisted data.