Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cryndoc/polisade-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.04702 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.01881 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00940 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00470 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 307 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/polisade:review [TASK-XXX] [self] — TASK Quality Review (external CLI or self)
"Второе мнение" по качеству постановки задачи. По умолчанию — внешний reviewer CLI (Codex / OpenAI). С флагом self — CLI текущего агента (Claude Code / Codex / Qwen CLI) в отдельном процессе с чистым контекстом.
Сама команда ничего не записывает — ни артефакты, ни PROJECT_STATE; результат advisory. Но ревьюер — отдельный процесс, и он запускается
автономно, с правом записи в рабочем каталоге: «ничего не
модифицируется» относится к команде, а не к делегату.
Флаг
self— для случаев, когда доступна подписка только на один агент. Ревью проводится тем же CLI, но в изолированном процессе (чистый контекст = более независимое мнение, чем self-review в текущей сессии).
Использование
/polisade:review TASK-001 # Review через reviewer CLI (auto-select)
/polisade:review # Auto-select первый ready TASK
/polisade:review TASK-001 self # Review через текущий агент
/polisade:review self # Auto-select + self-review
Архитектура
/polisade:review TASK-001
|
v
+-----------------------------------------+
| ОСНОВНОЙ АГЕНТ |
| 1. Определить TASK-ID |
| (аргумент или auto-select ready) |
| 2. Запустить субагент |
+-----------------+-----------------------+
v
+-----------------------------------------+
| СУБАГЕНТ (general-purpose) |
| Bash: codex exec (или CLI агента при |
| self) из корня проекта |
| Ревьюер сам: |
| - Находит TASK файл |
| - Определяет parent из frontmatter |
| - Читает гайдлайны из корня проекта |
| - Читает код/тесты при необходимости |
| Возвращает текст ревью |
+-----------------+-----------------------+
v
+-----------------------------------------+
| ОСНОВНОЙ АГЕНТ |
| Показать результат в формате box |
+-----------------------------------------+
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +22 lines 95b9f250ebf5
- 17d ago Changed e6d517eecf6c
- 18d ago Changed 455df9e1f37b
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines e63824ec0552
- 1mo ago Changed · +47 lines 468b78cb71f6
- 1mo ago First seen · 233 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 3604edbd114d
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cryndoc/polisade-orchestrator (7 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 4,702 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
arrow-maintenance
Navigation and audit overlay for linked-intent development. Use when working with docs/arrows/ — orienting via index.yaml, auditing spec-to-code coherence, detecting reverse orphans and drift, splitting/merging/renaming/re-parenting segments. Dual-mode: ambient guidance when the overlay is present…
review-depth
Experimental declared review depth for linked-intent development. Use when a LID project's instruction file declares a review depth in prose (e.g. "Review depth - I review through LLD; below that, consolidate to one review") or the user asks to batch phase reviews, consolidate stops, or let go below a phase depth.…
bidirectional-differential
Audit coherence across an arrow of intent by running two parallel fresh Claude sessions — one reconstructs code from a single EARS, the other reconstructs the EARS from stripped code — then classifies the drift between them. Use when the user invokes /differential-audit, asks to audit EARS-to-code drift for a feature…
vanellus
Skill "vanellus" from markmhendrickson/ateles, covering vanellus — pr steward, identity, principals, core job and automated pr review (swarm-panel invocation).
check-work
Check your work with a verification subagent that reviews diffs, runs builds and tests, and evaluates correctness. Read this file for instructions. Use when asked to "check work", "verify changes", "self-verify", "/check-work", "/check", "/verify", or "/self-verify".
defect-hunting
Use when reviewing code, auditing an app, writing a guard rule or test, or certifying any threshold/constant/formula. Finds the defects a diff review structurally cannot see — the second write path, the mis-calibrated constant, the rule that cannot fail. Triggers from code-reviewer, /app-audit, qa-engineer…