code-reviewer

code-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from cuongtl1992/vibe-skills. It costs 121 tokens per session (736 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured code-review guide for examining changes for correctness, quality, architecture, and maintainability. It uses labels such as blocking issue, suggestion, question, and minor issue to show priority.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests, diffs, or individual code changes and write actionable comments with an explanation and suggested fix.
Why use it?
It makes review feedback more consistent and helps reviewers focus first on problems that could break the software or should stop a change from being merged.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review pull requests, diffs, or individual code changes and write actionable comments with an explanation and suggested fix.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cuongtl1992/vibe-skills --skill code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cuongtl1992/vibe-skills/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 121 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 736 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00121 $0.00736
Opus 5 $0.00060 $0.00368
Sonnet 5 $0.00024 $0.00147
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00074

Measured 9d ago against content hash b5a2e21fe642, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/common/code-reviewer/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Reviewer

Systematic approach to reviewing code changes with consistent, actionable feedback.

Review Process

  1. Understand context — Read PR description, linked issues, related files
  2. Identify scope — What changed? What's the intent? What could break?
  3. Review by area — Apply relevant checklists from references/checklists.md
  4. Check architecture — Does it follow project patterns? See references/dotnet-patterns.md for .NET/Clean Architecture
  5. Provide feedback — Use comment format below, prioritize blocking issues first

Comment Format

Use prefixes to indicate priority:

Prefix Meaning Action
[BLOCKING] Must fix before merge Required
[SUGGESTION] Improvement opportunity Optional
[QUESTION] Need clarification Response needed
[NIT] Minor style issue Optional

Structure each comment as:

[PREFIX] Brief issue description

Why: Explanation of the problem or risk
Fix: Suggested solution or alternative

Example:

[BLOCKING] SQL injection vulnerability in user search

Why: User input concatenated directly into query string
Fix: Use parameterized query

// Before
var sql = $"SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Name = '{input}'";

// After  
var sql = "SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Name = @name";
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@name", input);

Review Priority Order

Review in this order to catch critical issues first:

  1. Security — Auth, injection, data exposure, multi-tenant isolation
  2. Correctness — Logic errors, edge cases, data integrity
  3. Performance — N+1 queries, missing indexes, resource leaks
  4. Architecture — SOLID violations, wrong layer, circular dependencies
  5. Code quality — Naming, duplication, readability
  6. Testing — Missing tests, flaky patterns
  7. Documentation — Missing or outdated docs

Feedback Principles

  • Point to exact lines with specific alternatives
  • Explain why something is problematic, not just what
  • Focus on code, not the author
  • Acknowledge good patterns when found
  • Batch related issues into a single comment
  • For large PRs: focus on architecture and security first, nits later

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A b5a2e21fe642

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository cuongtl1992/vibe-skills (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 736 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.