Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add curiositech/windags-skills --skill bordini-hubner-2007-jasongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/curiositech/windags-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/bordini-hubner-2007-jason)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/bordini-hubner-2007-jason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/bordini-hubner-2007-jason/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/bordini-hubner-2007-jason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/bordini-hubner-2007-jason.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01719 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
bordini-hubner-2007-jason scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- _book_identity.json 3.6 KB
- _raw_response.md 95 KB
- diagrams/01_flowchart_bdi_reasoning_cycle.md 1.4 KB
- diagrams/02_sequenceDiagram_multi-agent_coordination_via_s.md 2.0 KB
- diagrams/03_stateDiagram-v2_plan_execution_&_failure_recov.md 1.2 KB
- diagrams/INDEX.md 485 B
- references/context-driven-plan-selection.md 12 KB
- references/goal-subgoal-decomposition.md 12 KB
- references/graceful-failure-and-recovery.md 15 KB
- references/knowledge-level-communication.md 17 KB
- references/procedural-knowledge-encoding.md 19 KB
- references/reactive-proactive-integration.md 16 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 179 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a42440932ad7
bordini-hubner-2007-jason is a skill published in the GitHub repository curiositech/windags-skills (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,719 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
bigquery-graph
Skill for Graph Query Language (GQL) or SQL/PGQ queries against a property graph. Includes path finding, multi-hop traversal, topological connection, shortest path, node reachability, edge connectivity, and semantic graph queries.
adk-git
Writes commit messages and pull request descriptions for the adk-python repository: Conventional Commits types and scopes, subject lines that say why a change was made, and the linked-issue and testing-plan sections the PR template requires. Use when writing or rewording a commit message, squashing commits before a…
adk-sample-creator
Creates a new sample agent in the ADK Python repository — the sample directory, its agent.py, and its README.md — following the conventions the existing samples already use. Use when the user wants to add a sample or example demonstrating a feature or agent pattern (dynamic nodes, fan-out/fan-in, a standalone…
adk-unit-guide
Writes a hands-on developer guide for one ADK code unit — a minimal runnable example, how it works, a configuration-option table, advanced uses, limitations, and links to related samples — to docs/guides/{topic}/{unit}/index.md, then lists it in the index at docs/guides/README.md. Its reader is a developer calling the…
adk-architecture
Explains how the ADK runtime fits together: the node and graph execution model, Context and Event flow, checkpoint and resume, tracing, and the rules governing the public API surface. Use when answering "how does X work" about ADK internals, tracing where an event or a piece of state comes from, deciding where a new…
adk-review
Reviews the uncommitted changes in an adk-python working tree and reports correctness, design, public-API stability, test, sample and documentation gaps as a prioritized findings report, fixing them only when asked. Use when the user asks to review local changes, wants a self-review before opening a pull request, asks…