Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add curiositech/windags-skills --skill content-security-policy-headersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/curiositech/windags-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/content-security-policy-headers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/content-security-policy-headers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/content-security-policy-headers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/content-security-policy-headers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/windags-skills/content-security-policy-headers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00162 | $0.03928 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00065 | $0.01571 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00786 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00393 |
Grade A, and why
content-security-policy-headers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 274 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A 96e139612cb5
content-security-policy-headers is a skill published in the GitHub repository curiositech/windags-skills (16 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 3,928 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
secure-checkout
Harden your checkout against attacks with HTTPS enforcement, Content Security Policy headers, input sanitization, and card data tokenization.
security-patterns
Security patterns for Falcon Foundry apps including OAuth scopes, RBAC, input validation, UI security, and credential management. TRIGGER when user asks to "configure OAuth scopes", "secure a Foundry app", "handle secrets", "add input validation", or needs to review a Foundry app for security concerns (XSS, CSP…
CSP Security Testing
Content Security Policy testing and validation to prevent XSS attacks, data injection, and clickjacking through proper CSP header configuration.
dom-security-hardening
When hardening a web application against Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and injection attacks.
header-analysis
Analyze HTTP security headers for misconfigurations and missing security controls using httpx. Use when security header assessment is needed, when checking for clickjacking or XSS protections, when validating OWASP compliance, or when identifying information disclosure.
analyzing-web-application-http-headers
Analyze HTTP response headers for security misconfigurations including missing Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and information disclosure via Server/X-Powered-By headers. Covers manual inspection and automated scanning to identify header-based vulnerabilities and recommend remediations.