Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cwinvestments/memstack/rls-checkernpx skills add cwinvestments/memstack --skill rls-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwinvestments/memstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/rls-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/rls-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/rls-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.02818 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01409 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00564 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
memstack-security-rls-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 271 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🔒 RLS Checker: Auditing Row Level Security...
Audit Supabase Row Level Security policies across all tables in a project.
Activation
When this skill activates, output:
🔒 RLS Checker: Auditing Row Level Security...
Then execute the protocol below.
Context Guard
| Context | Status |
|---|---|
| User asks to check/audit RLS | ACTIVE: full audit |
| User mentions Supabase security | ACTIVE: full audit |
| User asks about table permissions | ACTIVE: full audit |
| User is writing RLS policies | DORMANT, they know what they're doing |
| Non-Supabase project | DORMANT: not applicable |
Protocol
Step 1: Discover Tables
Find all Supabase tables referenced in the project. Search in priority order:
-
Migration files: most authoritative source:
find . -path "*/migrations/*.sql" -o -path "*/supabase/migrations/*.sql" | head -50Look for
CREATE TABLEstatements. -
Generated types: comprehensive if available:
types/database.ts, types/supabase.ts, src/types/database.types.ts, database.types.tsParse the
Tablesinterface for all table names. -
Client usage: catches tables missed by above:
grep -r "\.from(['\"]" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js"Extract table names from
.from('table_name')calls. -
Storage buckets: separate RLS surface:
grep -r "storage\.from\|createBucket\|storage-api" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.sql"
Compile a deduplicated list of all tables and storage buckets.
Step 2: Extract RLS Policies
For each table, find its RLS configuration:
- Search migration SQL for RLS statements:
ALTER TABLE <name> ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY: RLS is onCREATE POLICYstatements: extract policy name, operation (SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/ALL), and USING/WITH CHECK expressionsALTER TABLE <name> FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY: RLS enforced even for table owners
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed eefd3429253a
- 2d ago First seen · 271 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 5e1f4455d6ed
memstack-security-rls-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository cwinvestments/memstack (419 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 2,818 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…
autoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…
design-review
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by OpenBitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
miniapp-dev
Develops, maintains, and generates OpenBitFun MiniApps (Zero-Dialect Runtime). Use when (1) working on miniapp framework code under src/crates/assembly/core/src/miniapp/ or src/web-ui/src/app/scenes/miniapps/; or (2) generating / creating / designing a NEW MiniApp for the user — including any request like "做一个小应用 / 生成…
investigate
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug…